Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Most of the time transverse plane motions don't effect the placement of one foot in front of the other. There are extremes where it matters. There is a certain amount of transverse plane motion of the pelvis over the femur. The trailing thigh will internally rotate relative to the pelvis. When this range of motion is used up the body can't take a longer stride by rotating the pelvis farther. For most people there is plenty of motion and you would have to take a really long stride to use up all of the range of motion. This pelvis motion is relative to the femur. The transvese plane position of the femur relative to the ground can also change with pronation and supination of the STJ. So, if you internally rotate the femur, with STJ pronation, you decrease the total possible pelvis rotation relative to the ground. So, with pronation of the STJ you will limit the maximum stride length.
If there is limited hip range of motion the maximum stride length will also be limited. There are some "compensations" that will also limit max stride length. For example, if someone is intoed, and they choose to get their foot to function straight ahead by externally rotating their femur relative to their hip, they will "use up" some of their available range of motion and this will limit the available stride length. Again, most people don't bump up against those extremes.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to efuller For This Useful Post:
I'm studying the hip knee and ankle movements individually and just feel i'm missing how the transverse motions have evolved together to aid gait.
The ability of the limbs to internally and externally rotate are a requirement of bipedal gait. As the contralateral limb is in swing phase, the ipsilateral limb must externally rotate so that it matches with the motions of the pelvis influenced by the swing limb.
When the foot is pronated (for whatever the reason), there is an internally directed tibial rotation. If this occurs in the 2nd half of single support, then there must be some type of counterrotation taking place, usually at the level of the knee. These two rotations, external from above and internal from below can raise havoc with the knee joint. Changes in foot function to allow for resupination at the time when external rotation is occuring from above can often resolve many problems associated with knee overuse.
The Following User Says Thank You to Dananberg For This Useful Post: