Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
This randomized controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate the effect of WF10 (Immunokine) as an adjunct to the standard treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. A total of 40 participants were randomized into two groups of 20. One group underwent standard therapy combined with infusions of WF10, and one underwent standard therapy combined with placebo. The wound severity scores, which vary with the severity of infection and inflammation, necrotic and granulation tissues, and wound depth and area, were assessed weekly for 9 weeks. Before treatment, the wound severity scores were not significantly different statistically between the two groups (13.7 ± 2.8 and 12.9 ± 3.2). After 9 weeks, the WF10 group had a statistically significant decreased wound severity score compared with that of the placebo group (1.8 ± 1.9 versus 4.4 ± 5.3, respectively, P < .05). Subgroup analyses comparing the WF10 and placebo groups showed statistically significant decreases of infection and inflammation (0.0 ± 0.0 versus 0.8 ± 0.9, respectively, P < .01), necrotic tissue (0.0 ± 0.0 versus 0.8 ± 1.1, respectively, P < .01), and an increase of the amount of granulation tissue (0.1 ± 0.3 versus 0.8 ± 1.2, respectively, P < .05). The wound depth and wound area also decreased more in the WF10 group; however, these decreases were not statistically significant. No severe adverse events were observed throughout the observation period. We concluded that the addition of WF10 to standard wound care statistically significantly reduced the wound severity score, infection and inflammation, and necrotic tissue and enhanced the formation of granulation tissue.