Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Harvard study- Forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers
I subscribe to Men's Health magazine which has alot of useful tips and information on physical activity and living the healthy lifestyle. However, today I just received the may issue where there is an article about running faster. One part stuck out at me and I wanted to know what your take is on the subject.
"Be on the Ball"
"If you land on your heel, you're almost certainly overstriding." says Alberto Salazar (who is a iconic american marathoner) "You're pounding your leg into the ground with each stride and increasing your risk of injury. When you land on the balls of your feet, you flow with your forward energy"
A recent study of Harvard runner supports Salazar's theory; it found that forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers.
From Men's Health Magazine, May 2012 pg. 118.
Has anyone every heard of this study? I would think the opposite is true, in that forefoot strikers would be more prone to injuries. From experience, i haven't come across very many forefoot strikers who are injury free.
__________________
Nick S. Caravaggio BSc. C Ped. (C)
Canadian Certified Pedorthist
Caravaggio Orthotic Therapy Clinic
Re: Harvard study- Forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Sebastian Caravaggio
Hey everyone,
I subscribe to Men's Health magazine which has alot of useful tips and information on physical activity and living the healthy lifestyle. However, today I just received the may issue where there is an article about running faster. One part stuck out at me and I wanted to know what your take is on the subject.
"Be on the Ball"
"If you land on your heel, you're almost certainly overstriding." says Alberto Salazar (who is a iconic american marathoner) "You're pounding your leg into the ground with each stride and increasing your risk of injury. When you land on the balls of your feet, you flow with your forward energy"
A recent study of Harvard runner supports Salazar's theory; it found that forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers.
From Men's Health Magazine, May 2012 pg. 118.
Has anyone every heard of this study? I would think the opposite is true, in that forefoot strikers would be more prone to injuries. From experience, i haven't come across very many forefoot strikers who are injury free.
Salazar was a great marathoner, but doesn't know what he is talking about in regards to injury frequency and footstrike pattern in runners. Currently, there are probably more runners being injured "trying" to be forefoot strikers upon the advice of ignorant coaches and know-nothing Chi, Pose or Alexander advocates, than there are injuries to those runners who remain rearfoot strikers.
__________________
Sincerely,
Kevin
**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College
Re: Harvard study- Forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers
Not normally wanting to go over old ground as it was well covered in the thread I linked above
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Sebastian Caravaggio
A recent study of Harvard runner supports Salazar's theory; it found that forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers.
...but that is a classic example of cherry picking and confirmation bias.
That study was on 56 runners who were almost elite level. Why did they choose to pick that study and ignore:
Quote:
Kleindienst (2003) - 471 runners; no difference between rearfoot and forefoot strikers concerning the frequency of injury
Walther (2005) - 1203 runners; no difference in incidence of injury between rearfoot and forefoot strikers
__________________ Craig Payne
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________ Follow me on Twitter | Run Junkie God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
Harvard study- Forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers
Linear Mode
