Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Web based practice managment systems

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd April 2012, 08:09 PM
AUStudent AUStudent is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17
Join Date: Jun 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Web based practice managment systems

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
Hi All,
Just wanting to know if any Aussie pods out there use a web based booking system?. I know that some of the better ones do not have support within Australia such as PPS and Practice Pal. Is there any good web based programs for pods with support in Australia?
Ren
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 27th June 2012, 10:27 PM
Steve5572 Steve5572 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 28
Join Date: Jul 2007
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

i use OPMS, they have very good support.

In general i am happy with the product and service they provide. My only complaint is the letter writting function, it is a but clumsy so i still do my letters manually with Word.

Take a look at their website www.intracore.com.au , i believe they offer a free trial so you can play around with it before committing financially.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th June 2012, 11:36 PM
AUStudent AUStudent is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17
Join Date: Jun 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Steve,
Thanks for your reply I have just signed up with Nookal and they are fantastic! Letter templates are great with them also.
Thread Starter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th July 2012, 08:49 PM
Buffalo Bill Buffalo Bill is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7
Join Date: Jul 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

How is Nookal and did you look at other programs like Cliniko?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th July 2012, 04:45 PM
Nat Smith's Avatar
Nat Smith Nat Smith is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 94
Join Date: Mar 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

I've been using Cliniko at one of my clinics for a few months now. My other clinic is still using FrontDesk...I must say, I wish Cliniko had of been around yrs ago before I wasted all the money on buying Front Desk.
As far as web based systems go, it is the only way to go forward as far as I'm concerned.

With my clinic on Front Desk, I found it very inconvenient and expensive last yr when I had to upgrade my computers. When you initially sign up, you get the CD/DVD to upload your software & after that all your upgrades are downloaded from the net. If you let your subscription lapse, you then can't use your initial software to upload onto a new computer...they then charge you an extortionate rate to access & re-download your software, (that you already bought). I just found it a bit unethical that you are essentially forced to keep upgrading, even if you're quite happy working with your current version.

Cliniko has thus far been brilliant IMO. They do constant upgrades and improvements; there's no huge upfront cost (unlike FD $4000); a reasonable monthly access fee (that is less than FD's annual subscription); you don't have to worry about backing up; and I can use it on any computer accessing it anywhere, anytime (I'm a Mac girl), even iPhone & iPad apps...

Get on it...

Nat
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nat Smith For This Useful Post:
Heather J (20th August 2012)
  #6  
Old 26th July 2012, 09:31 PM
Buffalo Bill Buffalo Bill is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7
Join Date: Jul 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Smile Re: web based practice managment systems

Thanks Nat, very helpful. I've started a trial and have enjoyed it thus far- is that sad?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29th July 2012, 02:07 AM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Thanks for the kind words Nat! We have had a great response from Podiatrists so far and are always looking to improve Cliniko to make it better.

If anyone has any questions about our system, you can see all the details on our website http://www.cliniko.com or I can answer any question.

Joel
Cliniko
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th July 2012, 08:10 PM
Zac Zac is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 109
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 22 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Joel. Do you have any plans to allow us (Allied Health) to monitor Team Care Arrangement (Medicare) refferals & the monitoring of how many visits the patient has had & maybe reminders of the need to write the initial & final letters? That would be really neat & would sway me to go to an online practice management system.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30th July 2012, 08:19 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zac View Post
Hi Joel. Do you have any plans to allow us (Allied Health) to monitor Team Care Arrangement (Medicare) refferals & the monitoring of how many visits the patient has had & maybe reminders of the need to write the initial & final letters? That would be really neat & would sway me to go to an online practice management system.
Hi Zac,

I would probably need a little more detail to answer accurately, but these are some related things we have planned:
  • Direct integration with Medicare online claiming (we have already started working on this)
  • Track treatment plans (ie. a certain number of planned sessions and how many are completed)
  • Customisable notifications based on rules (ie. send a certain email out at the end of a treatment plan, or if a patient has not been in for over 6 months).
The latter two points I don't have any estimated timeframe for yet but the Medicare integration is underway now.

We are really active on development though (on average, we release 2 - 3 updates per week based on customer feedback). We have maintained this speed since launch day just over 1 year ago now.

Joel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joelfriedlaender For This Useful Post:
Zac (30th July 2012)
  #10  
Old 12th August 2012, 03:35 PM
Spiro01 Spiro01 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 5
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Nat

I felt compelled to post here, as my experience is quite different.

I have been using Front Desk for more than 10 years to run multiple podiatry practices. I have tried other products and they don’t compare. The Software works all the time, is flexible and keeps meeting my changing needs. They take support seriously with a real helpdesk and technical people you can talk to on the phone. I pay their (reasonable) annual support fees and have never been asked to pay to upgrade my software. I have been using their Medicare/DVA online claiming for years.

I had a look at Cliniko with another practitioner and IT person, and can’t see how this can run a busy practice, It looks too rudimentary and looks like a work in progress. The other thing that worried me is that the data is hosted overseas so Australian consumer and privacy laws don’t apply. You might want to google “data sovereignty” issues.

The key with any product that is continually evolving is to stay in touch. We’ve always paid our support fees and have been delighted with the product (and service). Have you stayed up to date with your support?

Sorry Nat, but I wouldn’t risk my practice (or my data for that matter) to anyone else.

SV
Podiatry Care
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12th August 2012, 06:53 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiro01 View Post
Hi Nat

I felt compelled to post here, as my experience is quite different.

I have been using Front Desk for more than 10 years to run multiple podiatry practices. I have tried other products and they don’t compare. The Software works all the time, is flexible and keeps meeting my changing needs. They take support seriously with a real helpdesk and technical people you can talk to on the phone. I pay their (reasonable) annual support fees and have never been asked to pay to upgrade my software. I have been using their Medicare/DVA online claiming for years.

I had a look at Cliniko with another practitioner and IT person, and can’t see how this can run a busy practice, It looks too rudimentary and looks like a work in progress. The other thing that worried me is that the data is hosted overseas so Australian consumer and privacy laws don’t apply. You might want to google “data sovereignty” issues.

The key with any product that is continually evolving is to stay in touch. We’ve always paid our support fees and have been delighted with the product (and service). Have you stayed up to date with your support?

Sorry Nat, but I wouldn’t risk my practice (or my data for that matter) to anyone else.

SV
Podiatry Care
Hi Spiro,

Cliniko certainly isn't for everyone, each practice has their own needs and you obviously need to find what works for you best. I wouldn't say it isn't for busy practices though or is rudimentary and a work in progress. We have all size businesses using Cliniko all around the world (I think our largest business has over 20 practitioners).

As for work in progress, well, I think software is always a work in progress. We release updates to Cliniko every week (we have now released over 150 updates in the last 12 months). I don't think we will ever be able to say it is finished as needs change, technology changes and also we are really striving for perfection. It is definitely ready to be used right now though, and has been used by many for over a year now.

We also take patient information and data security very seriously. We do store information overseas, but we made that choice due to the security and availability we could get from vendors in the US compared to what is available here. We meet and exceed all legal requirements in Australia and most other countries (we are based in Melbourne ourselves). You can see further details on our security here http://www.cliniko.com/security.

I think FrontDesk is a decent choice for practices, in my mind it is a over-priced and not so easy to use, but if they aren't your deciding factors then it has a lot of functionality available.

Thousands of people are using Cliniko already (and we have only been around just over 1 year), I believe it to be the fastest growing practice management system available. We don't have everything you might need yet, but we are improving it everyday.

Cheers,

Joel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12th August 2012, 07:47 PM
Spiro01 Spiro01 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 5
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Certainly appreciate that Joel. I wanted to convey that my experience with Front Desk has been positive. I have had awesome service from the guys at FD ... this has been because i have kept up my end and supported them also (paid support). Just annoyed me that judgment was passed without the full story being told.
Cheers
Spiro
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12th August 2012, 10:01 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiro01 View Post
Certainly appreciate that Joel. I wanted to convey that my experience with Front Desk has been positive. I have had awesome service from the guys at FD ... this has been because i have kept up my end and supported them also (paid support). Just annoyed me that judgment was passed without the full story being told.
Cheers
Spiro
Absolutely. I wish there was a better place for people to review software systems. People's experiences are way more indicative than the sales pitch on the software companies websites (including ours of course). At least a forum like this is a good place for people to share.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 14th August 2012, 05:38 AM
björn björn is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 47
Join Date: Mar 2009
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

I like what I see with Cliniko - I have had a good look at it, and will yet use it one day, but its a little bit annoying to me when I see a few people on here sharing pros and cons on different options, and then a thread gets taken along a slightly different path by at least one person with a declared self interest, and someone anonymous with such a staunch defence, that I'd worry about a vested interest.

Joel, fair enough you got asked a question and you answered in a balanced fashion and you are upfront as to your role, but nearly every article I read on similar topics has you suggesting your software - which like I said looks great. I think it would be fairer if you perhaps had your own thread, sponsored or whatever, and then perhaps only monitored our other posts, so people don't "stop" talking on the topic. People are maybe less likely to keep discussing their experiences, when it turns into a 'mine's better than yours" scenario like we have here at the moment?

The thing that annoys me with either web based or computer based options is: Why can't I just buy the software, get x months amount support included and then if I stop paying the fee, I get no support - but not roped into an ongoing contract? Make the software, take your money, support it briefly and then say your on your own to the customer?

Regards,

Björn
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to björn For This Useful Post:
Ryan@PPS (23rd August 2012)
  #15  
Old 14th August 2012, 07:38 PM
TonyT TonyT is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Björn

Most Australian vendors of Allied Health PMS have optional support and upgrades agreements.

In our case almost all our clients choose to take up a support and upgrades agreement as their software is critical to the running of their practice, requiring professional support should it be required, and that at some point they will need a software update due to changes in IT environments (Windows 8 ?), 3rd party interfaces (printers, scanners, HICAPS, Medicare Online…) and practice management requirements (EHealth..).

Being on a support/upgrades agreement is definitely the easiest and most cost effective way to use critical software over time, which is confirmed by many of our business savvy clients who would not purchase software unless future support and upgrades agreements are available, however it is optional.

I wish I could get the same deal on my car. (smile)

Tony
Smartsoft
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 14th August 2012, 09:31 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by björn View Post
I like what I see with Cliniko - I have had a good look at it, and will yet use it one day, but its a little bit annoying to me when I see a few people on here sharing pros and cons on different options, and then a thread gets taken along a slightly different path by at least one person with a declared self interest, and someone anonymous with such a staunch defence, that I'd worry about a vested interest.

Joel, fair enough you got asked a question and you answered in a balanced fashion and you are upfront as to your role, but nearly every article I read on similar topics has you suggesting your software - which like I said looks great. I think it would be fairer if you perhaps had your own thread, sponsored or whatever, and then perhaps only monitored our other posts, so people don't "stop" talking on the topic. People are maybe less likely to keep discussing their experiences, when it turns into a 'mine's better than yours" scenario like we have here at the moment?

The thing that annoys me with either web based or computer based options is: Why can't I just buy the software, get x months amount support included and then if I stop paying the fee, I get no support - but not roped into an ongoing contract? Make the software, take your money, support it briefly and then say your on your own to the customer?

Regards,

Björn
Hi Björn,

It's definitely not my intention to stifle good conversation here. I wish more podiatrists would get in here and discuss pros/cons of systems, I think it's good for the industry. I will be more cognisant of my level of activity.

In response to your direct point about buying the software outright. I don't think that's in anyones best interests. I really think paying up front for licenses and then optional customer support/maintenance is a broken pricing model. I won't divert the conversation again, but if you want to discuss more, send me an email to joel@cliniko.com and I will be more than happy to discuss.

Joel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joelfriedlaender For This Useful Post:
Heather J (20th August 2012)
  #17  
Old 14th August 2012, 09:58 PM
TonyT TonyT is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Joel

If you read Björn's post he is also questioning paying ongoing fees for web based solutions. Can he keep using your system if he stops paying his reoccurring fees?

I disagree with your comment below as this is how almost all vertical market software is sold and supported.

<<I really think paying up front for licenses and then optional customer support/maintenance is a broken pricing model>>

At least your simplistic views on practice management and how others should run their businesses is consistent. You really should stop touting for business and knocking established vendors on this forum.

Tony
Smartsoft
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TonyT For This Useful Post:
Ryan@PPS (23rd August 2012)
  #18  
Old 14th August 2012, 11:09 PM
Stuart Blyth Stuart Blyth is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 73
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Joel
As a practice manager that has used many different PMS packages over a number different health industries I understand the importance of data security and disaster recovery. The importance of our patient and financial data cannot be understated and indeed if my PMS data disappeared overnight my practice would probably not survive.

The first question I ask when looking at a PMS, especially in a hosted environment such as yours, is “Where is my data? Can I get my data out in a easily readable format (I.e. SQL, Excel , Access etc.) in the event that the provider of the software disappears overnight?”

I am not casting dispersions on anyone’s company here, but software providers do come and go and penalty have gone broke over the years, trust in a PMS provider is one thing but it doesn’t compare to a copy of my patient files and financial data in my hot little hand that I can restore without the help of said PMS provider.
Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15th August 2012, 03:04 AM
Two Shoes Two Shoes is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21
Join Date: Oct 2007
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

I am a sole practitioner about to open my own practice so I am doing a lot of research and looking at PMS at the moment. Threads like these are a useful guide.

My experiences so far:
I have used Frontdesk at another practice for the past 3 years and found it good, but confusing.

I also recently contacted Frontdesk and was told it would cost $4550 up-front and $695 per annum for upgrades. For a sole practitioner, this is very high and too much for me.

I am looking towards trying Cliniko and plan to take their one-month trial offer soon, just to get a feel for it.

The points raised about ongoing payments to Cliniko and data retrieval are also valid and I wonder what happens to all my data if I decide to leave Cliniko at a point in the future.

To TonyT: Smartsoft has a good product, but way too expensive.

And I don't believe Joel has been flogging his product any worse than some other members here. I am not stupid so I can see through the guff and I believe it is a good thing that people can take part on forums to answer criticisms/praise or queries from posters.

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 15th August 2012, 04:17 AM
Spiro01 Spiro01 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 5
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Its interesting to hear peoples perceptions on what's expensive.

Ive been in private practice for 20 years and paid $5500 in the early 90's for a D base system called FootWare ... promised the earth but was gone in 18 months. The point here is what value do you put on a vital tool that is literally the nerve centre of your practice? A great PMS system directs your marketing dollars, determines associate productivity, controls direct mail and referrer communication, handles sales processes, creates powerful databases, helps design and safely store clinical notes etc etc.
All software is confusing if not trained to use it.
As a practice owner who has also consulted for the medical industry as medical marketer, spending $4500 for a powerful, proven, supported, evolving tool is NOT expensive ... I would go as far as to say that I would NEVER consider operating a practice without FD.
Dear colleagues, being myopic on an up front fee and cutting this corner/expense will cost you plenty in the long run ... Id be happy to share my experiences with you personally.
Regards
Spiro V
Podiatry Care and author of the Practice Builder Program
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spiro01 For This Useful Post:
Heather J (12th November 2012)
  #21  
Old 15th August 2012, 05:29 PM
Two Shoes Two Shoes is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21
Join Date: Oct 2007
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Spiro

You make valid points, but my start-up budget will only stretch so far.

I won't direct $4550 to FD because that money will be directed towards other priorities during my initial set-up.

I am going to go the old hard copy method until I get some money coming into the business then re-assess.

Now, who to see about this myopia???

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15th August 2012, 06:09 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart Blyth View Post
Hi Joel
As a practice manager that has used many different PMS packages over a number different health industries I understand the importance of data security and disaster recovery. The importance of our patient and financial data cannot be understated and indeed if my PMS data disappeared overnight my practice would probably not survive.

The first question I ask when looking at a PMS, especially in a hosted environment such as yours, is “Where is my data? Can I get my data out in a easily readable format (I.e. SQL, Excel , Access etc.) in the event that the provider of the software disappears overnight?”

I am not casting dispersions on anyone’s company here, but software providers do come and go and penalty have gone broke over the years, trust in a PMS provider is one thing but it doesn’t compare to a copy of my patient files and financial data in my hot little hand that I can restore without the help of said PMS provider.
Cheers
Stuart
Hi Stuart,

Control of your data is really important. In Cliniko you can export everything at any time into CSV files (we think this is the best format for you to be able to take your data elsewhere). The export looks like this http://cl.ly/image/3O221c163w0P.

You can do that export at any time (for regular backups), we even still make the export available to you after your subscription has ended with Cliniko (you can log in for 90 days after a subscription has ended and export everything out).

A web-based solution doesn't exclude having control of your data as long as they have the features built in to let you get it out easily.

Joel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joelfriedlaender For This Useful Post:
Heather J (20th August 2012)
  #23  
Old 15th August 2012, 06:19 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyT View Post
Joel

If you read Björn's post he is also questioning paying ongoing fees for web based solutions. Can he keep using your system if he stops paying his reoccurring fees?

I disagree with your comment below as this is how almost all vertical market software is sold and supported.

<<I really think paying up front for licenses and then optional customer support/maintenance is a broken pricing model>>

At least your simplistic views on practice management and how others should run their businesses is consistent. You really should stop touting for business and knocking established vendors on this forum.

Tony
Smartsoft
Hi Tony,

They cannot continue to use Cliniko if they don't continue the subscription, that is how our system works, it is a service, not a licensing purchase. This is also why they can get started with no upfront fees, and paying as little as $45 p/month.

They aren't just paying for use of the software though, we also provide backups, unlimited support, hosting, monitoring, upgrades, etc.

As for the licensing model not being broken because that's how almost all vertical market software is sold... well frankly I think we can do better than was done in the past. I think the software industry is evolving, we are finding better ways to build software and also better business models that work well for customers and vendors.

I think the SaaS model is win/win, customers get access to software with no big upfront cost (which helps small businesses a lot), their expenses are very predictable, and they can end at any time and change vendors with no invested money lost. For the vendor we get a reliable income stream so that we can plan and manage our business more effectively rather than relying on the inconsistency of sales. Of course there is more to it than that, but hard to sum up SaaS vs. Upfront licensing in a paragraph.

Also, please don't get me wrong, I think you have built a great product and it is helping many businesses. I just personally think there are better business models now for selling software.

Joel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joelfriedlaender For This Useful Post:
Heather J (20th August 2012)
  #24  
Old 16th August 2012, 01:22 AM
Spiro01 Spiro01 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 5
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Darren,
Point taken about start up capital.
More than happy to help direct you during this phase of your business. It can be a scary time but also an exciting one.
Call the clinic on 0883570747 for a chat if you like.
Cheers
Spiro
PS OPSM?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 19th August 2012, 10:44 PM
TonyT TonyT is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by joelfriedlaender View Post
Hi Tony,

They cannot continue to use Cliniko if they don't continue the subscription, that is how our system works, it is a service, not a licensing purchase. This is also why they can get started with no upfront fees, and paying as little as $45 p/month.

They aren't just paying for use of the software though, we also provide backups, unlimited support, hosting, monitoring, upgrades, etc.

As for the licensing model not being broken because that's how almost all vertical market software is sold... well frankly I think we can do better than was done in the past. I think the software industry is evolving, we are finding better ways to build software and also better business models that work well for customers and vendors.

I think the SaaS model is win/win, customers get access to software with no big upfront cost (which helps small businesses a lot), their expenses are very predictable, and they can end at any time and change vendors with no invested money lost. For the vendor we get a reliable income stream so that we can plan and manage our business more effectively rather than relying on the inconsistency of sales. Of course there is more to it than that, but hard to sum up SaaS vs. Upfront licensing in a paragraph.

Also, please don't get me wrong, I think you have built a great product and it is helping many businesses. I just personally think there are better business models now for selling software.

Joel
Hi Joel

I have no problem with the “software as a service” model per se. However let’s be clear that this is not the significant difference in our offerings. I wouldn’t normally comment on these matters as there is room for all types of products but it is important to balance your frequent self-serving views posted here.

Looking at your product, it has a small subset of the features ( < 10%) of that provided by traditional vendors in this space and would only be suitable for the simplest of practice management requirements. Your product certainly is simple and doesn’t require any training, not because you have come up with a new advanced interface/software model but only because it doesn’t do very much. Further, your attempt to keep your costs down by hosting overseas, as mentioned by yourself and others, outside of your company’s and clients’ ultimate control is of concern when dealing with this type of sensitive data.

The salutation option of “Zombie Lord” when adding a new patient in your system in the list of possible titles ie Mr, Mrs… shows the level of professionalism we are dealing with here. Perhaps this is funny to you.

25 years’ experience in practice management, the first 7 as a practitioner, and 20 years as a commercial software developer tells me your clients are just getting what they are paying for and perhaps less @ $25 per month.

Zombie Lord Tony
Smartsoft
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TonyT For This Useful Post:
Ryan@PPS (23rd August 2012)
  #26  
Old 19th August 2012, 10:58 PM
Zac Zac is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 109
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 22 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Wow this turned personal quickly. I dont use either system & I have no doubt there are pros & cons for each system.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20th August 2012, 04:37 AM
Heather J Heather J is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Welcome Committee
 
About:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,012
Join Date: Feb 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 508
Thanked 66 Times in 64 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Hi Zac, Aus you really started something here. Hi Nat missed you at Private practice special interest groups. Hope you are fit and well. Spiro Podiatry Care and author of the Practice Builder Program, are you promoting a program?

Cheers

Heather
__________________
Heather J Bassett
137 Wheatsheaf Road
GLENROY VICTORIA 3046
AUSTRALIA
03 9306 8557
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 20th August 2012, 04:43 AM
Zac Zac is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 109
Join Date: May 2012
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 22 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

I did notice Spiro01 initially signed off with Spiro & then he signed off with Spiro Podiatry Care & Parctice Builder Program later on.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zac For This Useful Post:
Heather J (20th August 2012)
  #29  
Old 20th August 2012, 11:41 PM
joelfriedlaender joelfriedlaender is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 54
Join Date: Jun 2011
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: web based practice managment systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyT View Post
Hi Joel

I have no problem with the “software as a service” model per se. However let’s be clear that this is not the significant difference in our offerings. I wouldn’t normally comment on these matters as there is room for all types of products but it is important to balance your frequent self-serving views posted here.

Looking at your product, it has a small subset of the features ( < 10%) of that provided by traditional vendors in this space and would only be suitable for the simplest of practice management requirements. Your product certainly is simple and doesn’t require any training, not because you have come up with a new advanced interface/software model but only because it doesn’t do very much. Further, your attempt to keep your costs down by hosting overseas, as mentioned by yourself and others, outside of your company’s and clients’ ultimate control is of concern when dealing with this type of sensitive data.

The salutation option of “Zombie Lord” when adding a new patient in your system in the list of possible titles ie Mr, Mrs… shows the level of professionalism we are dealing with here. Perhaps this is funny to you.

25 years’ experience in practice management, the first 7 as a practitioner, and 20 years as a commercial software developer tells me your clients are just getting what they are paying for and perhaps less @ $25 per month.

Zombie Lord Tony
Smartsoft
We are going to be in real trouble at Cliniko if it turns out that professionalism and fun are mutually exclusive. Both are core to our company.

As for "< 10% of features that other vendors have", if we can provide our customers with a system that meets their needs and still have less than 10% of features our competitors have... well that's a stat I will be most proud of.

Joel
Cliniko - www.cliniko.com

Last edited by joelfriedlaender : 20th August 2012 at 11:53 PM. Reason: removed bold
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 21st August 2012, 01:52 AM
Heather J Heather J is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Welcome Committee
 
About:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,012
Join Date: Feb 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 508
Thanked 66 Times in 64 Posts
Default Re: Web based practice managment systems

Hi Joel, I have tried to send you a private message but am unable to do so! I think it may be due to my change in security product!! Painful experience I am finding out. I also am struggling to access my private messages here!! arrrgh. I am good at Podiatry NOOOOT so good at IT stuff. Trying to catch up with you... :-)

Cheers

Heather
__________________
Heather J Bassett
137 Wheatsheaf Road
GLENROY VICTORIA 3046
AUSTRALIA
03 9306 8557
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nookal web based practice management system AUStudent Practice Management 1 24th May 2013 05:53 AM
Factors influencing evidence-based practice NewsBot Teaching and Learning 3 25th June 2012 09:09 PM
Marketing 'systems' such as "ideal practice" Moose Practice Management 21 8th December 2010 11:50 AM
Computer-based pressure-measuring systems monkey rob Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 4 15th March 2006 10:57 AM
Expanding practice-based commissioning in a patient-led NHS. Mark Russell United Kingdom 4 17th August 2005 11:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 PM.