Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Hourly variation in joint ROM

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by davidh, Oct 10, 2004.

Tags:
  1. davidh

    davidh Podiatry Arena Veteran


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Hi all.
    There is some evidence to support the concept of circadian variation in joint ROM.

    Essentially what this means is that joint ROM alters over a 24-hour period. This is not as simple as "stiff after exercise" or "loose in the morning, stiff at night" but seems to follow no particular pattern.
    The best ref I could find for this is :
    Yung P, Unsworth A, Haslock I. Measurement of stiffness in the metacarpophalangeal joint: Circadian variation. Clin Phys. Physiol Meas,. Vol 5, no 2 57-65 (1984).

    I also had to do a little work on this myself and found that ankle joint complex (AJC) frontal plane ROM varied by up to 6 degrees in one subject over the course of one day. This was measured using a purpose-built rig, rather than a hand-held instrument (unpublished, but can be viewed in my MSc thesis at University of Durham, UK, if anyone is interested :eek: ).

    In view of the practice of measuring Joint ROM during a biomech examination, could this variation affect overall theraputic results, and should we be looking at specific protocols when doing a biomech examination (eg measuring after loosening the AJC and subtalar joints by manipulation, or carrying out biomech examination at a specific time of day) :confused:
    What do others think?
    Regards,
    David
     
  2. Ian Linane

    Ian Linane Well-Known Member

    Hi David

    My initial response is to say it is not an area I have considered.

    Whether a casted orthosis could be so accurately made to account for this degree of variation during the day I suspect not ( and think of what would be charged for it. Still there's a thought!!). Whether you go for an average of the variation and post, adapt arch height or pitch the device accordingly is an interesting question.

    In the case of lig laxity there may not be a need to take this variation into account :confused: In instances where limited AJC rom is considered muscular or ligamentous in origin it may be worthwhile considering if a device could be made to control GRF and torque forces that may initiate stiffening through poor proprioceptive feed back during the day:

    i.e. How much of the low ROM in the morning is resulting from soft tissue stress as the day proceeds?

    This is not the same as suggesting stiffness after exercise but a thought that the body may be self protecting.

    All of this assumes that the circadian variation is being considered abnormal!! It may well be natures protective and adaptive measure.

    Apologies if my guesses are butchering biomechanical concepts but I come at it from a very amateurish position and knowlege.

    Of course it is a question that follows on nicely from Cameron's view of the importance of Saggital plane action.

    cheers

    Ian
     
  3. davidh

    davidh Podiatry Arena Veteran

    Hi Ian,

    "All of this assumes that the circadian variation is being considered abnormal!! It may well be natures protective and adaptive measure."
    I believe it to be normal. The reference I gave provides further information, and you can get a really good flavour of what circadian variation is from reading it.

    "Apologies if my guesses are butchering biomechanical concepts but I come at it from a very amateurish position and knowlege."
    I think most of us who are involved in podiatric biomech will readily admit that we don't have all the answers :confused: .
    Circadian variation is simply another variable to add to the melting pot.
    In fact it may be more important to take this into account when carrying out research which involves examining joint ROM, rather than to apply it specifically to pod biomech.
    Regards,
    David
     
  4. admin

    admin Administrator Staff Member

    Plantar Flexion Torque as a Function of Time of Day

    This just appeared:

    Plantar Flexion Torque as a Function of Time of Day

     
  5. davidh

    davidh Podiatry Arena Veteran

    Hi Admin,
    Thanks for that.
    Seems like we shouldn't be ignoring diurnal/circadian variation after all?

    Actually, I did some work with only 7 subjects, but measured coronal ROM at the ankle joint complex (with a purpose-built rig with good reliability/repeatability) every two hours over a 12-hour period.

    Time to write up and submit for publication methinks?

    Regards,
    david
     
Loading...

Share This Page