Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags:

Effect of spinal manipulation on growing pains in children

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th April 2014, 12:49 PM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 12,039
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 53% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 496 Times in 406 Posts
Default Effect of spinal manipulation on growing pains in children

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
The effect of lumbosacral manipulation on growing pains
De Beer, Dawid Petrus
M.Tech. (Chiropractic) Thesis 2014
Quote:
Introduction
The aim of this study is to determine whether standard leg rubs and reassurance combined with lumbosacral manipulations have an effect on growing pain symptoms by comparing it to standard leg rubs and reassurance only. The study can possibly serve as a platform for further research. Furthermore, this will be one of the first chiropractic studies done in this field and may provide the chiropractic profession with a proven treatment for growing pains.
Methodology
Thirty participants with growing pains between the ages of 4 and 12 years were recruited. The participants were placed into two groups of fifteen participants each on a first come first serve basis. The two groups received different treatment protocols according to their group allocation. Group One received chiropractic manipulative therapy to the lumbar spine and sacroiliac joint restrictions combined with legs rubs and reassurance administered by the parent(s)/guardian(s). Group Two received only legs rubs and reassurance administered by the parent(s)/guardian(s). The participants completed the study over a period of three weeks. Subjective and objective readings were taken. Subjective readings from each participant were taken using the Oucher self-rating pain scale (OSRPS) and a pain diary completed by the parent(s)/guardian(s). Objective readings were taken using a pressure algometer over the anterior tibial muscles bilaterally. A six-week post study follow up was done via email.
Results
The statistical data was analyzed using the Friedman test, Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The results demonstrated that both groups responded favourably to their specific treatment over time. However, Group One proved to show a quicker response to treatment over time; and the post study follow up of Group One proved to be significantly more positive than Group Two. These results highlight the positive effects of the chiropractic manipulation. Discussion
The fact that the participants of Group One have improved in subjective and objective measurements and the parent(s)/guardian(s) of the participants have responded very positively to the post study follow up, one has to consider that the anatomical theory proposed by Evans and Scutter (2007), the pain referral theory supported by Cookson (2003) and the activation of pain inhibitory systems supported by Wright (1995) and Sterling et al. (2001) might all be a likely aetiologies for growing pains. However, one has to consider that the participants from Group Two, who received no spinal manipulation, have also improved in subjective and objective readings. Therefore it is possible, and cannot be excluded, that the leg rubs administered to both groups could also have played a role in relieving the growing pains.
Conclusion
The results of the data collected from this study, the pressure algometer and OSRPS readings, showed that spinal manipulation did not have much of a benefit. However, the pain diaries and feedback from the parent(s)/guardian(s), which are probably more reliable for growing pains, indicates that spinal manipulation does show to be beneficial.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 6th April 2014, 12:51 PM
Admin2's Avatar
Admin2 Admin2 is offline
Administrator
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 3,684
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 126 Times in 111 Posts
Default Re: Effect of spinal manipulation on growing pains in children

Related Threads:
Other threads tagged with growing pains
Are 'growing pains' and 'restless legs syndrome' the same thing?
Growing Pains in Children
Age 7, hot, painful feet during the night, crying in pain
Juvenile nocturnal foot pain
Rickets or just underfed with growing pains?
Growing pains and vitamin D supplementation
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th April 2014, 12:54 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,608
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 766 Times in 525 Posts
Default Re: Effect of spinal manipulation on growing pains in children

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewsBot View Post
placed into two groups of fifteen participants each on a first come first serve basis
ie not randomized ==> red flag
Quote:
Objective readings were taken using a pressure algometer over the anterior tibial muscles bilaterally
I don't understand the rationale for doing that over that muslce
__________________
Craig Payne
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Follow me on Twitter | Run Junkie | Latest Blog Post: Hoka One One vs Vibram FiveFingers
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Growing pains and vitamin D supplementation NewsBot Pediatrics 1 19th March 2014 09:23 PM
Influence of Foot Orthotics Upon Duration of Effects of Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Back Pain Patients: NewsBot Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 1 14th January 2014 09:19 PM
Growing Pains in Children Ian North Pediatrics 34 16th May 2013 02:58 PM
2 Year old complaining... doc says growing pains?! RSSFeedBot Foot Health Forum 0 21st April 2009 06:30 AM
Researcher vs clinician revisited spinal manipulation Simon Spooner Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 11 16th December 2008 11:05 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 AM.