Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Examination of quantitative and fractal analysis of sway characteristics of the center of foot pressure ovement during a static upright posture. Analysus based on alchool intake. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Jun;45(2):229-37.
Quote:
AIM: This study aimed to examine the sway characteristics of center of foot pressure (CFP) movement during a static upright posture under the influence of alcohol by using quantitative and fractal analysis.
METHODS: Eleven healthy young people participated. They drank in a range of 0.54-1.83 ml/kg of alcohol, standardized by body mass, within 10 min. Blood pressure, heart rate, 2 types of nervous function tests and the CFP movement were measured before and after the alcohol intake. Thirty-six parameters of the CFP movement were used for quantitative analysis. Diffusion coefficient, scaling exponent and critical point coordinates were used in fractal analysis.
RESULTS: Quantitative analysis confirmed that the CFP parameters such as distance, velocity and area were significantly changed, although the parameters evaluating cyclical characteristics and center average were not. Fractal analysis confirmed that critical point coordinates existed at time-lag=1.0 before and after the alcohol intake, and the short-term region (ST) and long-term region (LT) could be separated. A diffusion coefficient in the ST was larger than that in the LT, and the scaling exponent was over 0.5 in the ST and under 0.5 in the LT.
CONCLUSIONS: Influences of alcohol intake were found in amount of body-sway, but not in the displacement or periodicity of the CFP parameters. Fractal analysis confirmed that CFP movement was dependent on time-series, and its characteristics changed before and after the time-series critical point and was unsteady.
Centre of foot pressure and alcohol consumption
Linear Mode
