Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags:

Help with orthotics

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th July 2008, 11:41 PM
suzilobo29 suzilobo29 is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Help with orthotics

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
I've got a pt with a partially compensated rearfoot varus. He presented due to his wife claiming he 'walked funny' and has mild bilateral knee pain which he attributes to damaged cartilage. He is a heavy fellow. In gait he pretty much stays supinated throughout the cycle with heaavy heel strike. I have got him into a pair of formthotics with the goal of reinforcing these with poron when I establish his wear pattern. I was thinking of building up the medial side of the foot but this may cause lateral ankle instability which he has previously not complained about. Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 27th July 2008, 12:18 AM
David Wedemeyer's Avatar
David Wedemeyer David Wedemeyer is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 857
Join Date: Apr 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: help with orthotics

What other information can you share with us suzilobo?

Is the rearfoot flexible or rigid? I would assume this gentleman has a cavus foot type? Is there significant tibial varum? How about forefoot valgus?

The cavus foot tends to be a supinator and are the most challenging patients I have encountered. I believe from what I have learned in practice (and especially in reading Dr. Kevin Kirby's papers it is a concept reinforced here frequently) is that the STJ axis in these patients tends to be deviated laterally.

This would make the standard approaches less effective, ie; merely building up the medial arch and rearfoot extrinsic posting.

One of the most important paper that I have ever read and one that addresses this issue specifically, is Dr. Kirby's "Rotational Equilibrium Across the Subtalar Joint Axis". If you search around the board there are numerous discussions of these issues.

Good luck
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright

David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th July 2008, 12:54 AM
suzilobo29 suzilobo29 is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: help with orthotics

Hi David,
Thanks for the reply. This patient does indeed have a cavus foot type and tibial varum. He has a forefoot valgus also. The foot is pretty stiff all round. My intentions were to simply accomodate his foot type and not try to reposition it due to his limited rom. I actually have the rotational equillibrium paper to hand, and on reflection, yes I see what you mean: I may be increasing the supination moment in a foot type like this by medially posting. I would be glad of any further suggestions you may have.
Thread Starter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th July 2008, 08:00 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,713
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 437
Thanked 1,038 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Where is the knee pain?
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th July 2008, 09:51 AM
David Wedemeyer's Avatar
David Wedemeyer David Wedemeyer is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 857
Join Date: Apr 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

suzilobo,

I have had good results with Northwest Podiatric Labs composites (2-D flex) and flexible copoly's even with a rigid cavus foot. I know that I may be bucking convention here and am opening myself to being beat about the torso by some for not using strictly accommodative materials on the pes cavus foot .

I am confused though because you describe a partially compensated rearfoot varus and yet you state that his "foot is pretty stiff all around" Have you performed a Coleman Block Test on this patient?

After reading the paper on Rotational Equilibrium and as I began to grasp the concept of deviated STJ axes, I shifted my focus to the patient's symptoms and not merely on what I can see and feel on exam. I have had many patients similar to the one that you describe; pes cavus, varus rearfoot, forefoot valgus, medial (I am guessing with your patient) knee pain.

They often have cuboid, sinus tarsi and 5th met isssues in some combination. If the rearfoot is partially compensated and the Coleman Block Test is positive, then I would tend to believe that this patient has enough range of motion and flexibility in the STJ to allow you to use a lateral heel skive to resist excessive supination moments and the devices will be comfortable for the patient.

Certainly you could cause iatrogenic lateral column symptoms if you merely "build up the medial arch" and ignore the supination moments in this foot type. I also have found that many of these patients have a platarflexed first ray and often lack dorsiflexion stiffness at the first ray. Functional hallux limitus and apropulsive gait with a supinatory rock at push-off are common findings. Once you shift the STJ axis more medially there are these issues at the 1st met joint to assess and consider when prescribing.

I would consider based on what you have told us here using tight arch fill, a deep heel cup, lateral heel skive, forefoot valgus posting (based on the Lateral Forefoot Elevation Test), possibly a 2-5 bar, valgus wedge extension, Poron atop the devices for cushioning.

Any cuboid or 5th met symptoms can be addressed with the appropriate cutouts and cookies.

I often use a 2-5 bar in these patients because they offload the forefoot during propulsion. NW Podiatry does an excellent job of extending the valgus post in the forefoot of the device and patients report the post and extension are comfortable.

I hope that helps
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright

David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th July 2008, 10:32 AM
David Smith's Avatar
David Smith David Smith is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,785
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 357 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

David

Coleman Block Test - What's that?

Dave S
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th July 2008, 10:33 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,713
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 437
Thanked 1,038 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Wedemeyer View Post
suzilobo,

I have had good results with Northwest Podiatric Labs composites (2-D flex) and flexible copoly's even with a rigid cavus foot. I know that I may be bucking convention here and am opening myself to being beat about the torso by some for not using strictly accommodative materials on the pes cavus foot .

I am confused though because you describe a partially compensated rearfoot varus and yet you state that his "foot is pretty stiff all around" Have you performed a Coleman Block Test on this patient?

After reading the paper on Rotational Equilibrium and as I began to grasp the concept of deviated STJ axes, I shifted my focus to the patient's symptoms and not merely on what I can see and feel on exam. I have had many patients similar to the one that you describe; pes cavus, varus rearfoot, forefoot valgus, medial (I am guessing with your patient) knee pain.

They often have cuboid, sinus tarsi and 5th met isssues in some combination. If the rearfoot is partially compensated and the Coleman Block Test is positive, then I would tend to believe that this patient has enough range of motion and flexibility in the STJ to allow you to use a lateral heel skive to resist excessive supination moments and the devices will be comfortable for the patient.

Certainly you could cause iatrogenic lateral column symptoms if you merely "build up the medial arch" and ignore the supination moments in this foot type. I also have found that many of these patients have a platarflexed first ray and often lack dorsiflexion stiffness at the first ray. Functional hallux limitus and apropulsive gait with a supinatory rock at push-off are common findings. Once you shift the STJ axis more medially there are these issues at the 1st met joint to assess and consider when prescribing.

I would consider based on what you have told us here using tight arch fill, a deep heel cup, lateral heel skive, forefoot valgus posting (based on the Lateral Forefoot Elevation Test), possibly a 2-5 bar, valgus wedge extension, Poron atop the devices for cushioning.

Any cuboid or 5th met symptoms can be addressed with the appropriate cutouts and cookies.

I often use a 2-5 bar in these patients because they offload the forefoot during propulsion. NW Podiatry does an excellent job of extending the valgus post in the forefoot of the device and patients report the post and extension are comfortable.

I hope that helps
Great, and the presenting problem is....
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simon Spooner For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #8  
Old 27th July 2008, 10:39 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,713
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 437
Thanked 1,038 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Smith View Post
David

Coleman Block Test - What's that?

Dave S
http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/coleman_block_test
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simon Spooner For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #9  
Old 27th July 2008, 11:28 AM
David Smith's Avatar
David Smith David Smith is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,785
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 357 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Suzi

I'm a bit confused - ie you have a partially compensated rearfoot varus but the foot in gait remains supinated. Your thinking of medial posting but the fore foot is valgus. Read this thread.http://www.podiatry-arena.com/podiat...ead.php?t=3896

Just so we are both reading from the same page- this is a compensated rearfoot varus.




http://www.footmaxx.com/uploaded/pro...df/file_22.pdf

Bearing in mind I'm not sure what the problem is you are trying to address, eg is it knee pain, funny walking, poor shock attenuation, wife's peace of mind??

First (as Simon and David have implied) decide on what it is you are trying to achieve. Then if its stabilising the foot and increasing shock attenuation then, mobilise the ankle RoM. add some heel lifts, post the forefoot valgus, drop 1st ray and add 1st MPJ c/o and lower the medial arch. Do not post the rearfoot.
Then again if he has lateral knee pain this strategy may make it worse. You should look more proximally to see what the hip and femur are like relative to the lower limb segment. If he has restricted or no internal hip rotation available then this may be winding up the knee and causing supination at the foot during swing thru. In which case you do not want to be valgus posting the foot. If the knee is hyperextending in compensation for the equinus then heel lifts and mobs may be benificial. If the knee stays flexed thru the gait then heel lifts may make this worse. If the knee pain is medial read this - (Use of Laterally Wedged Custom Foot Orthoses to Reduce Pain Associated with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis A Preliminary Investigation Russel Rubin, BSc(Hons), NHDPod(SA) * and Hylton B. Menz, PhD, BPod(Hons) Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 95 Number 4 347-352 2005) or it could be medial pain below the medial tubercle of the tibia(can't recall the name of that syndrome right now but some one will remind me) in which case lateral posting will make it worse. And so on and so forth, as you can see it is vital to be clear what it is you are treating before going ahead with an intervention. Just restoring the gait to some arbitrary perception of normal is worse than pointless. Having said that, do just that and it often works but its just this side of luck really.

All the best Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.

Last edited by David Smith : 27th July 2008 at 11:30 AM. Reason: grammar
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to David Smith For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #10  
Old 27th July 2008, 12:03 PM
David Wedemeyer's Avatar
David Wedemeyer David Wedemeyer is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 857
Join Date: Apr 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Simon

I realize that you are somewhat frustrated over the lack of fine detail in Suzi's post regarding this patient. I certainly didn't mean to add to that. I agree that it is not enough information to post a succinct response. I was merely trying to open a dialogue as to how given what she has described might in fact be a whole different scenario than her initial examination and some things to consider for this patient.

David

As usual your post is highly detailed and well thought out. I was also confused by the presentation so I took the liberty of 'theorizing' what Suzi might be describing and some possible ideas to address them. There are often issues more proximal to address as you have pointed out. I intended to go there if and when Suzi gave a more detailed description.

I am not afraid to either make mistakes here nor be corrected. I much prefer to make a mistake or present an idea that is corrected here than to encounter a glaring failure in practice and I do appreciate all of your input and ideas. It helps me to learn and advance my practice.

Sadly often when one of you veterans responds I realize just how much more there is to learn and apply, which is quite humbling. I am willing to put my head on the chopping block and post because it is your responses that have helped me to gain so much in terms of my understanding of very complex subjects. I hope I didn't frustrate either of you when I responded to Suzi.
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright

David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to David Wedemeyer For This Useful Post:
alaranjo (6th March 2013), Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #11  
Old 28th July 2008, 07:22 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,713
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 437
Thanked 1,038 Times in 761 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Wedemeyer View Post
Simon

I realize that you are somewhat frustrated over the lack of fine detail in Suzi's post regarding this patient. I certainly didn't mean to add to that. I agree that it is not enough information to post a succinct response. I was merely trying to open a dialogue as to how given what she has described might in fact be a whole different scenario than her initial examination and some things to consider for this patient.
David, not frustrated, nor trying to chop off your head. The successful application of the tissue stress model requires accurate identification of the tissue under stress. You referred to Kevin's rotational equilibrium paper; this forms part of the tissue stress approach. So I was guessing that you also probably agree with this approach.

Now, from the original post we have:

"He presented due to his wife claiming he 'walked funny' and has mild bilateral knee pain which he attributes to damaged cartilage. He is a heavy fellow."

So does the patient have cartilage damage or not? Is it medial or lateral. The knee is a complex joint with many potential pathologies, without proper examination and diagnosis how can we possibly design a successful orthoses? We need to know which tissue is damaged and what its function is in order to "off-load" stress within that tissue.

Lets say we "know" that the patient has cartilage damage. The orthoses prescription would be different depending on whether that damage was in the medial or lateral compartments- right? We can perhaps postulate given the scant details provided as to which compartment will be problematic using the tissue stress model- but experience dictates that there are tons of patients that don't "fit" the "theory".

So my posts here were designed to get Suzilobo to make a diagnosis before selling her orthoses. In my experience this will make for more successful orthoses design and a happier patient base.
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Simon Spooner For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #12  
Old 28th July 2008, 08:17 AM
Robertisaacs's Avatar
Robertisaacs Robertisaacs is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,290
Join Date: May 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 454
Thanked 908 Times in 524 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
So does the patient have cartilage damage or not? Is it medial or lateral. The knee is a complex joint with many potential pathologies, without proper examination and diagnosis how can we possibly design a successful orthoses? We need to know which tissue is damaged and what its function is in order to "off-load" stress within that tissue.
Simons point is well made. As has been previously discussed if there is medial knee OA it might be that a lateral heel wedge is the path to joy.

This, for me, is the problem with the "Rootian" model in its pure form. We are examining the foot in context of the "criteria for normalcy" with rearfoot alignment as one of them. However it may be that accomodating compensations is not the most appropriate treatment!

Personally i would prefer to know the diagnosis first (what is causing the pain) THEN know the biometric peculiarities of the foot in order to know A: the potential cause of the pain (if it is an ongoing functional trauma) and B: the best way to reduce tissue stress in the affected tissues.

Regards
Robert
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Robertisaacs For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008), thekwie (5th March 2013)
  #13  
Old 28th July 2008, 10:02 PM
Kevin Kirby's Avatar
Kevin Kirby Kevin Kirby is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,425
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 397
Thanked 2,105 Times in 1,160 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Spooner View Post
Now, from the original post we have:

"He presented due to his wife claiming he 'walked funny' and has mild bilateral knee pain which he attributes to damaged cartilage. He is a heavy fellow."

So does the patient have cartilage damage or not? Is it medial or lateral. The knee is a complex joint with many potential pathologies, without proper examination and diagnosis how can we possibly design a successful orthoses? We need to know which tissue is damaged and what its function is in order to "off-load" stress within that tissue.

Lets say we "know" that the patient has cartilage damage. The orthoses prescription would be different depending on whether that damage was in the medial or lateral compartments- right? We can perhaps postulate given the scant details provided as to which compartment will be problematic using the tissue stress model- but experience dictates that there are tons of patients that don't "fit" the "theory".

So my posts here were designed to get Suzilobo to make a diagnosis before selling her orthoses. In my experience this will make for more successful orthoses design and a happier patient base.
Simon makes an excellent point here in regards to the case report inquiry posed by Suzi. There is no way I could help a fellow podiatrist with a patient if the only thing they could tell me about their knee is that their patient has "knee pain". This is like saying, the patient has "foot pain".......pretty nonspecific....wouldn't you say?

One cannot also assume that just because a patient has medial knee pain, that the patient necessarily also has medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Off the top of my head, medial knee pain can be caused by medial collateral ligament strain, a medial meniscal tear, pes anserinus bursitis, to name a few. Lateral knee pain can be caused by lateral collateral ligament strain, iliotibial band syndrome, popliteus tendinitis, lateral knee OA, lateral meniscal damage or biceps femoris insertional tendinitis, to name a few. Anterior knee pain can be caused by prepatellar bursitis, patellofemoral syndrome, patellar tendintis, quadriceps retinacular strain, patellar fat pad syndrome, to name a few. Posterior knee pain can be gastrocnemius muscle strain, hamstring insertional tendinitis, Baker's cyst, or a posterior capsular strain caused by hyperextension of the knee, to name a few. Internal knee derangements (i.e. anterior or posterior cruciate, medial or lateral meniscal or osteochondral injuries) can also cause knee pain, but may be poorly localized with pain on extension, knee effusion, locking of the knee and difficulty walking being evident also.

As far as medial joint line pain in the knee, this can be caused by excessive STJ pronation moments which will cause excessive tensile stresses in the medial collateral ligament and a medial collateral ligament strain. This type of pain is nicely treated with a foot orthosis that increases the external STJ supination moments (i.e. varus wedged orthosis). However, medial joint line pain may also be caused by medial knee OA due to increased interosseous compression pressures within the medial compartment of the knee. Medial knee OA may be made worse by a varus wedged foot orthosis and, in fact, is best treated with a valgus wedged foot orthosis that increases the external STJ pronation moments.

Therefore, to say "knee pain" doesn't help anyone with a diagnosis. Please be more specific with the anatomy. If you don't know the anatomy, then there are many excellent anatomy textbooks and knee examination textbooks that will help the podiatrist becoming more adept at performing a thorough and accurate knee examination.
__________________
Sincerely,

Kevin

**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College

E-mail: kevinakirby@comcast.net
Website: www.KirbyPodiatry.com

Private Practice:
107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
My location

Voice: (916) 925-8111 Fax: (916) 925-8136
**************************************************
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kevin Kirby For This Useful Post:
Heather J (9th August 2008)
  #14  
Old 29th July 2008, 02:18 AM
David Smith's Avatar
David Smith David Smith is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,785
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 357 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
(can't recall the name of that syndrome right now but some one will remind me)
pes anserinus bursitis That was the one I was thinking of

Thanks Kevin

Dave S
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29th July 2008, 02:25 AM
David Smith's Avatar
David Smith David Smith is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,785
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 357 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Suzi

Thought this might help.



If you have a foot with a valgus fore foot you could post like the top two diagrams, Depending on how you want to change the moments about a certain point eg the sub talar joint (or, theoretically, (careful here) what position you would like the calcaneous to tend towards)

The bottom two diagrams show how posting can result in reduced tension in a tissue e.g. a tendon, but no change in the position of the joint. This would be useful if the tendon was over stressed and painful. Oh! d = lever arm length.

Hope this helps

Dave Smith
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to David Smith For This Useful Post:
alaranjo (6th March 2013), suzilobo29 (29th July 2008)
  #16  
Old 29th July 2008, 03:25 PM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzilobo29 View Post
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply. This patient does indeed have a cavus foot type and tibial varum. He has a forefoot valgus also. The foot is pretty stiff all round. My intentions were to simply accomodate his foot type and not try to reposition it due to his limited rom. I actually have the rotational equillibrium paper to hand, and on reflection, yes I see what you mean: I may be increasing the supination moment in a foot type like this by medially posting. I would be glad of any further suggestions you may have.
Expanding a little on the coleman block test question:

Differentiating between rearfoot varus and rigid forefoot valgus is something discussed within the Root paradigm. Often not directly, but it was discussed. Both "deformities" will have an inverted heel and both may have high lateral forefoot pressure. How do you tell the difference between them. (Does a rearfoot varus cause a forefoot valgus?) The key is available range of motion of the forefoot to lift off of the ground. A partially compensated rearfoot varus will use up all of the available subtalar joint range of motion to attempt to get the medial column on the ground. A forefoot valgus that causes supination of the STJ will have available range of motion of the STJ. This is how you tell the diference between the two. You place a block under the lateral forefoot and the rearfoot varus foot will not have calcaneal eversion, becasue none is available, and the forefoot valgus will show calcaneal eversion when standing on the block.

Adding a valgus forefoot wedge under the partially compensated varus foot will hurt as you are trying to evert the foot further than its range of motion will allow.

Cheers,

Eric
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to efuller For This Useful Post:
alaranjo (6th March 2013), David Wedemeyer (30th July 2008)
  #17  
Old 30th July 2008, 12:33 PM
David Wedemeyer's Avatar
David Wedemeyer David Wedemeyer is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 857
Join Date: Apr 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Eric

Thank you for that explanation of the Coleman Block Test. I have always had trouble verbalizing those concepts and putting them on paper, often having to look to a reference when I find this on a patients exam. I have no idea why this one simple test causes my brain to misfire and grasp for clarity. Your explanation is one that made much more sense to me than how it was initially presented and will be useful.

Of course now I have to try and figure out the concepts in David's diagram. I could be at it for a long, long time.

Regards,

The neophyte
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright

David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31st July 2008, 11:06 AM
David Smith's Avatar
David Smith David Smith is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,785
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 357 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

David W

Quote:
Of course now I have to try and figure out the concepts in David's diagram. I could be at it for a long, long time.
Think of this - A person lifts a 100kg rock to a height of 1metre. That person has 1000N of force applied thru their legs and acting on the ground. For equilibrium the ground must also push back (apply force) with the same force.
Now that force is finite ie 1000N and so if two people now pick up the rock they share equally the load and so only 500N of force per person is applied by the ground to the feet. The rock is still at 1metre height.
Substitute the people for foot structure (eg tendon) and orthosis and there you have it. The rock could be lifted higher if they chose to do so but 1 meter is all that is required. The tendon could, via the muscle, pull harder but the foot position is ok and so it does not need to. Muscle and tendon due to their dynamic nature do not have a fixed stress strain relationship, whereas ligaments do, within the limitations of their viscoelastic properties. Ligament and other passive structures must change length as the stress changes.

Does this help?? Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to David Smith For This Useful Post:
alaranjo (6th March 2013), David Wedemeyer (31st July 2008)
  #19  
Old 31st July 2008, 12:12 PM
David Wedemeyer's Avatar
David Wedemeyer David Wedemeyer is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 857
Join Date: Apr 2008
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

David

I am new to the tissue stress theories but I am beginning to glean the meaning as I read on here. That is helpful and it does make sense.

Thank you

Regards,

David
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright

David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 4th March 2013, 08:11 PM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by efuller View Post
Expanding a little on the coleman block test question:

Differentiating between rearfoot varus and rigid forefoot valgus is something discussed within the Root paradigm. Often not directly, but it was discussed. Both "deformities" will have an inverted heel and both may have high lateral forefoot pressure. How do you tell the difference between them. (Does a rearfoot varus cause a forefoot valgus?) The key is available range of motion of the forefoot to lift off of the ground. A partially compensated rearfoot varus will use up all of the available subtalar joint range of motion to attempt to get the medial column on the ground. A forefoot valgus that causes supination of the STJ will have available range of motion of the STJ. This is how you tell the diference between the two. You place a block under the lateral forefoot and the rearfoot varus foot will not have calcaneal eversion, becasue none is available, and the forefoot valgus will show calcaneal eversion when standing on the block.
...
Cheers,

Eric
Placing the heel only on a block would also differentiate them, no?
__________________
"nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" ............ Dobzhansky 1964
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 5th March 2013, 12:21 AM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by markjohconley View Post
Placing the heel only on a block would also differentiate them, no?
What the Block does is shift the location of center of pressure to a more lateral position. This will increase the pronation moment from the ground. If there is range of motion, then the STJ will pronate. There will generally be a longer lever arm at the forefoot than at the heel. There are some very rare feet in which the entire foot is medial to the axis and neither location would end up pronating the STJ. Theoretically, there could be a foot in which the block under the lateral forefoot would pronate the STJ and a block under the heel would not. This is not very likely.

Of course if you ask the patient to evert, and they understand your directions, they will use their peroneal muscles to create a pronation moment and if there is range of motion they will pronate. So, you could see if there is range of motion without using the block.

Eric
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to efuller For This Useful Post:
thekwie (5th March 2013)
  #22  
Old 5th March 2013, 04:39 AM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Goodaye Eric, what I was thinking is;
by placing the block under the heel only, that takes away the external forces through the forefoot so if partially/uncompensated rearfoot varus then the rearfoot would remain inverted whereas in a foot with a rigid forefoot valgus the rearfoot would evert as the external pronatory moment from the medial forefoot would be eliminated. Is that what you said?, thanks, mark
__________________
"nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" ............ Dobzhansky 1964
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to markjohconley For This Useful Post:
alaranjo (6th March 2013)
  #23  
Old 5th March 2013, 01:40 PM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by markjohconley View Post
Goodaye Eric, what I was thinking is;
by placing the block under the heel only, that takes away the external forces through the forefoot so if partially/uncompensated rearfoot varus then the rearfoot would remain inverted whereas in a foot with a rigid forefoot valgus the rearfoot would evert as the external pronatory moment from the medial forefoot would be eliminated. Is that what you said?, thanks, mark
Forces on the forefoot contribute to the total center of pressure. The further lateral the center of pressure is to the STJ axis the more likely you are to generate a pronation moment that will evert the foot if there is range of motion available to do so. So, there is no reason to eliminate the forces on the forefoot. All you want to do is create a large pronation moment to see if the STJ has range of motion to pronate.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 5th March 2013, 02:48 PM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Thanks Eric for taking the time to reply,
I comprehend what your saying, and if I was trying to differentiate between laterally deviated STJ axis and partially compensated rearfoot varus then the Coleman block test but if it's a rigid forefoot valgus then the forefoot grf wouldn't be needed, to differentiate, as there would be no retrograde inversion external eversion moments. Don't get me wrong I don't mind being proven wrong, look at all my previous biomechanical posts (not my climate change ones, can't understand the gullibility of some intelligent people not accepting science), all the best, mark
__________________
"nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" ............ Dobzhansky 1964
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 5th March 2013, 04:03 PM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by markjohconley View Post
Thanks Eric for taking the time to reply,
I comprehend what your saying, and if I was trying to differentiate between laterally deviated STJ axis and partially compensated rearfoot varus then the Coleman block test but if it's a rigid forefoot valgus then the forefoot grf wouldn't be needed, to differentiate, as there would be no retrograde inversion external eversion moments. Don't get me wrong I don't mind being proven wrong, look at all my previous biomechanical posts (not my climate change ones, can't understand the gullibility of some intelligent people not accepting science), all the best, mark
I believe that a rigid forefoot valgus has a laterally deviated STJ axis. The retrograde force from the forefoot is still dependent upon the location of the STJ axis. If the first met head is lateral to the axis force on the first met head will pronated the STJ and when the first met head is medial to the STJ axis, force on the first met head will supinate the STJ.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 5th March 2013, 05:41 PM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by efuller View Post
I believe that a rigid forefoot valgus has a laterally deviated STJ axis. The retrograde force from the forefoot is still dependent upon the location of the STJ axis. .
Thanks, wouldn't the foot have the laterally deviated STJ axis as a result of the rigid forefoot valgus?
__________________
"nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" ............ Dobzhansky 1964
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 5th March 2013, 06:13 PM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by markjohconley View Post
Thanks, wouldn't the foot have the laterally deviated STJ axis as a result of the rigid forefoot valgus?
Now we are getting into philosophy. Some Root disciples classified forefoot valgus as rigid or flexible. A rigid one is one that compensates at the STJ and a flexible one is one that does not compensate with STJ supination. So the rigid forefoot valgus foot might be rigid because it has a laterally positioned STJ axis.

Yes, in a more supinated STJ position the axis will tend to shift laterally. So there is some inter-relationship.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 5th March 2013, 08:56 PM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 1,226
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 524
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Thanks Eric
__________________
"nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" ............ Dobzhansky 1964
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 6th March 2013, 10:33 AM
alaranjo's Avatar
alaranjo alaranjo is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aveiro
Posts: 15
Join Date: Mar 2009
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Hey everyone!

I was reading all the posts and had some doubts. I had a patient with: pes cavus, forefoot valgus, with rearfoot varus compensating that forefoot, and hallux limitus (comproved by X-ray).
I made him orthoses, for the cavus foot. In the beginning I tried only the cut-out and he said it hurt, then I tried elevating the 2-5th metatarsal heads and it hurt, the only solution I found was a cut-out with a pronated forefoot wedge from the 2-5th metatarsal heads. It was the only way I could make him comfortable and without pain. I know it sounds, I don't know "stupid", perhaps, but I tried everything, and I'm beginning to be frustrated with this, because it's probably overloading the forefoot... A little help please!

Cheers,

André
__________________
"Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by themselves"

André Laranjo
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 9th March 2013, 12:43 AM
efuller efuller is online now
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,266
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 407 Times in 338 Posts
Default Re: Help with orthotics

Quote:
Originally Posted by alaranjo View Post
Hey everyone!

I was reading all the posts and had some doubts. I had a patient with: pes cavus, forefoot valgus, with rearfoot varus compensating that forefoot, and hallux limitus (comproved by X-ray).
I made him orthoses, for the cavus foot. In the beginning I tried only the cut-out and he said it hurt, then I tried elevating the 2-5th metatarsal heads and it hurt, the only solution I found was a cut-out with a pronated forefoot wedge from the 2-5th metatarsal heads. It was the only way I could make him comfortable and without pain. I know it sounds, I don't know "stupid", perhaps, but I tried everything, and I'm beginning to be frustrated with this, because it's probably overloading the forefoot... A little help please!

Cheers,

André
What is a pronated forefoot wedge?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too much for orthotics? Ian Linane Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 19 28th February 2009 08:29 AM
Stepahead orthotics?? cperrin United Kingdom 12 3rd April 2008 11:35 AM
Length of the orthotics falconegian Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 3 8th October 2007 09:21 AM
Orthotics and Speed docpodjy Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 8 11th May 2007 08:23 AM
Evolution of Orthotics mandy236 Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 9 11th October 2006 02:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 PM.