Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Recently (last 6 months) I have been using the bike to improve my fitness.
I usually do between 2 and 4 hours (20 - 45miles) over hilly terrain on and off road. I tend to pedal with just the ball of my foot on the pedal. However since last week, after about 1 hour riding I get a really excruciating burning, stabbing pain in, what feels like the 4th 5th digits. Getting off the bike and standing immediately relieves the pain and if I walk around for 30 seconds or so I can cycle for another hour.
I am assuming there is irritation of the digital nerve in the 3rd interspace since squeezing it reproduces the pain but more in the 4th toe.
What kind of modification can I make either in shoe or to the pedal to relieve this.
It does not hurt at all when walking but then I do not walk for hours at a time since I have a spinal stenosis that prevents me doing this.
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Hi Dave I recently had a cyclist in who said this was a very common sympton among cyclists. This particular client had an extremely hard insole inside his cleats which we have exchanged for a softer one and have tried adding cushioning and a met dome. No feed back yet.
Good Luck with yours a look forward to hearing some expert opinions
cheers
__________________
Heather J Bassett
137 Wheatsheaf Road
Glenroy 3046
Victoria
Australia
Recently (last 6 months) I have been using the bike to improve my fitness.
I usually do between 2 and 4 hours (20 - 45miles) over hilly terrain on and off road. I tend to pedal with just the ball of my foot on the pedal. However since last week, after about 1 hour riding I get a really excruciating burning, stabbing pain in, what feels like the 4th 5th digits. Getting off the bike and standing immediately relieves the pain and if I walk around for 30 seconds or so I can cycle for another hour.
I am assuming there is irritation of the digital nerve in the 3rd interspace since squeezing it reproduces the pain but more in the 4th toe.
What kind of modification can I make either in shoe or to the pedal to relieve this.
It does not hurt at all when walking but then I do not walk for hours at a time since I have a spinal stenosis that prevents me doing this.
Cheers Dave
What kind of pedals are you using i.e., cleats? And what kind of shoes- A wider/ looser shoe should help BTW. Also take a look at the crank arms- any excess scuffing from medial malleolus?
Any more details from an objective work-up you can offer that may help? Best thing to do is find a friend with a turbo trainer and video yourself cycling.
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
I too am a road cyclist. I have been through quite a few different bikes, cleats, shoes and finally bought a new pair of shoes and designed a nifty pair of orthoses for myself.
The easy solution is as Simon said, a wider shoe possibly. Certain brands are notoriously narrow (ok they all are), Shimano, Vittoria, Nike.
Sidi, Lake and Pearl Izumi tend to have a wider toebox which may help. In my case my entire toes went numb prior to changing shoes and adding the inserts. I finally spent the money and bought a pair of Sidi Genius 5.5 and I wasn't disappointed. I also changed pedals to Shimano SPD-SL (Look has a similar wide base).
I also found that what was true for my subtle cavus, wide Barney Rubble foot held true in a cycling shoe. I have a high flexible arch and valgus forefoot so I used felxible composite sheets, full length, added 1/16 poron and posted the entire foot heel to forefoot in 4 degrees valgus by adding plaster to the casts . No more numbness.
The full-length valgus posting really helped. I noticed that I tended to ride with my knees/hips canted in varus, apparently that coupled with the narrow shoes really made my feet supinate on the pedals.
Bike fit is important as well as you know. Tell us more about your feet, bike, crank, shoes etc?
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright
David G. Wedemeyer, D.C., C.Ped.
The Following User Says Thank You to David Wedemeyer For This Useful Post:
As you understand I can't give much info on riding biomechanics since I can't watch myself. However I am just about to purchase some 2D video analysis equipment so perhaps I will be able to do this soon.
I have always worn wide fitting deep toe box shoes since I tend to have deep met heads and retracted 2nd. The right foot that is giving pain is slightly valgus in the forefoot and previuos 3D video and force plate analysis shows that I do supinate after heel strike and then go into pronation with a STJ ROM of around 8-10dgs and max pronation of STJ about 6-7dgs.
I made myself orthoses (OTC modified)several years ago which were very succesful in relieving bunion pain and hip pain plus resolving a 5th mpj plantar h.d. I wear them all the time and replace them as required.
I'm not sure how orthoses are applicable to cycling since there is only a reaction force acting on the met heads.
I'll try a valgus post in the forefoot and check that my shoes are wide enough and see what happens.
Actually, today I did look at the sole of my shoes that I usually use for cycling and there is a wear hole right under the 3rd 4th met area. So perhaps a new pair with a more rigid sole might be better to spread the local forces.
It is strange how its quite difficult to be objective on yourself without some feedback.
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
I've been looking at cleats and they might be good since the contact area is different to the flat symmetrical pedals I have at present.
This is what I was trying to ascertain earlier, i.e. were you wearing cycling shoes or trainers and were you using cleated pedals or not. I guess you've kind of answered that in a round about way.
Your question re: orthoses and GRF in cycling raises an interesting point: if I use a three quarter length device in a cycling shoe with a cleat plate beneath met heads 2/3 will the orthoses have influence on foot mechanics?
The answer is yes.
Also you can add a wedge between the cleat plate and shoe if necessary or use fairly rigid full length shells. Also, some shoes have a built in varus wedge.
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
I get the same thing when on a step machine in the gym - I only get it when using BM's low gear axis; I do not get it when I use BM's high gear. I know there are issues with BM theoretical construct, but when I use the concept to change my forefoot weightbearing, it helps .... now there has to be a research project in that!
__________________
Craig Payne
Department of Podiatry
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Australia http://www.latrobe.edu.au/podiatry
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________ God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
The views expressed above are those of the author and not that of La Trobe University This is where I am, where are you?
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Payne For This Useful Post:
This is what I was trying to ascertain earlier, i.e. were you wearing cycling shoes or trainers and were you using cleated pedals or not. I guess you've kind of answered that in a round about way.
Your question re: orthoses and GRF in cycling raises an interesting point: if I use a three quarter length device in a cycling shoe with a cleat plate beneath met heads 2/3 will the orthoses have influence on foot mechanics?
The answer is yes.
I can see how this is possible with cleated shoes since there torque can be transmitted thru the shoe sole and so apply forces at the heel that have origin at the forefoot.
You answer your question with an emphatic yes, how do you arrive at this firm conclusion.
Craig
Yes if I can get the foot pushing off on the 1st 2nd met heads more than the 3rd 4th then this should stop the pain. I can actually reproduce the pain by standing in tip toe on the right foot only. Naturally I bear weight on the 3rd 4th met heads, by conciously everting the rearfoot the pressure is borne by the 1st 2nd heads and the pain is relieved.
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
I can see how this is possible with cleated shoes since there torque can be transmitted thru the shoe sole and so apply forces at the heel that have origin at the forefoot.
You answer your question with an emphatic yes, how do you arrive at this firm conclusion.
Emphatic? Just answering the rhetoric question. I was referring to cycling shoes and like you, I believe that the torque is "transmitted" through the shoe and also through the foot. Do you think that there will be no "transmission" in softer soled shoes? What effect does a 4mm polyprop shell have on the stiffness of the shoe? I also think the shoe upper is important BTW.
Dave, you can probably draw this one out. As the foot pushes against the pedal we have a dorsiflexion moment from the forefoot against the pedal and a plantarflexion moment from the achilles at the ankle joint to counter this and prevent the foot dorsiflexing on the leg as the power goes on, at the midfoot these forces will create what Kevin terms "an arch flattening" moment. Do you think 3/4 length orthosis will have any influence in countering this arch flattening moment in this situation?
Of interest, I had a pretty good triathlete in for review today. I'd previously made him two pair of devices, one pair for his racing flats and a pair for his cycling shoes (cleated). He loved the ones in his running shoes but was getting arch irritation in his cycling shoes- he put this down to too much compression between the shoe, foot and orthoses.
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
My first thought is no not unless the shoe is very tightly bound to the foot and th efoot cannot slide inside the shoe.
I will have to look at this more closely
Cheers Dave
So you don't think there will be any interface pressure between the foot and an orthosis in a shoe that isn't very tightly bound? BTW have you ever worn cycling shoes? They tend to be very tightly bound and have a rigid shank. Why do they need a rigid shank? & to reiterate a previous question, what effect will the orthoses have on the shank stiffness?
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
My first thought is no not unless the shoe is very tightly bound to the foot and the foot cannot slide inside the shoe.
The way I look at this sort of thing is to: put your finger into a bench mounted vice grips; screw it up tight (but not too tight); ... note how much the bones of the finger can actually move inside the skin.
BTW, this reminds me of a very old definition I use of gout with the students. It goes something like: Tighten the the vice grips as tight as possible, that is rheumatiosm; give it one more turn, then that is gout.
__________________
Craig Payne
Department of Podiatry
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Australia http://www.latrobe.edu.au/podiatry
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________ God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
The views expressed above are those of the author and not that of La Trobe University This is where I am, where are you?
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Payne For This Useful Post:
The way I look at this sort of thing is to: put your finger into a bench mounted vice grips; screw it up tight (but not too tight); ... note how much the bones of the finger can actually move inside the skin.
Did this with an index finger gripped about the intermediate phalanx and rotated. What I did note is a large percentage decrease in motion at the intermediate and distal phalanx compared to ungripped state, while the proximal phalanx continued to rotate as before = increase rotation at the intersegmental joint= change in kinematics.
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
So you don't think there will be any interface pressure between the foot and an orthosis in a shoe that isn't very tightly bound? BTW have you ever worn cycling shoes? They tend to be very tightly bound and have a rigid shank. Why do they need a rigid shank? & to reiterate a previous question, what effect will the orthoses have on the shank stiffness?
Clearly there will be some change in foot arch stiffnes but whethe ir would be significant in terms of reduction in internal tissue stress is not clear, to me at least.
I have not worn cycling shoes but I would imaginge they would need to fix around the heel to have a significant effect on arch stiffness in the saggital plane.
I feel it is more likely that there is a resistance to torque in the frontal plane since both rearfoot and forefoot have levers available to them. To cause a bending moment you require three forces anf the shoe and orthosis only has two in the saggital plane.
In the frontal plane the twist of the forefoot on rearfoot would allow levers that could be lengthened and the relative thickness, second moment of area, increased by the orthosis.
The bespoke shape of the orthosis may reduce the tendency for seperate rotation of orthosis in relation to foot. So does this mean that if a shoe is tightly fitted that a 3/4 length orthosis can significantly change the mechanical properties of the foot after heel of during normal gait. Or is this characteristic limited to the cleated shoe that can apply pedal reaction forces in two vertical directions, which is impossible with normal ambulation.
So to answer you question Simon, cleated shoes require a stiff shank to enable them to resist frontal plane torque that is able to be produced / significantly increased, due to the unique force transmission properties of the cleated shoe. IE the cleat allows a vertical push pull twisting action that is difficult / impossible to achieve without a shoe fixed to the pedal, or the ground in the case of normal walking.
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
The Following User Says Thank You to David Smith For This Useful Post:
This is what the American Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine have to say:
"Besides selecting a bicycle that meets your specific needs, proper shoes are the most important piece of cycling equipment. Cycling shoes must have a stable shank to efficiently transfer power from your feet to the pedals. The lack of shank support in sneakers allows the foot to collapse through the arch while pedaling, which may cause arch pain, tendon problems, or burning under the bottom of the foot. A rigid shank protects your feet from the stress of pedaling."
Doesn't your third force needed to create the bending come from the body above transmitted through the shank to the talus?
P.S. Cycling shoes had a stiff shank before cleated pedals were invented and cleated shoes release from the pedal when you twist.
Do you think the interface pressure between the foot and the 3/4 orthosis would equal zero in a training shoe when cycling?
__________________ Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition
I get the same thing when on a step machine in the gym - I only get it when using BM's low gear axis; I do not get it when I use BM's high gear. I know there are issues with BM theoretical construct, but when I use the concept to change my forefoot weightbearing, it helps .... now there has to be a research project in that!
Craig,
I'm sure its been discussed on here before and I've missed it - could you point me in the direction of the paper/discussions which take issue with BM theory please
This is what the American Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine have to say:
"Besides selecting a bicycle that meets your specific needs, proper shoes are the most important piece of cycling equipment. Cycling shoes must have a stable shank to efficiently transfer power from your feet to the pedals. The lack of shank support in sneakers allows the foot to collapse through the arch while pedaling, which may cause arch pain, tendon problems, or burning under the bottom of the foot. A rigid shank protects your feet from the stress of pedaling."
Doesn't your third force needed to create the bending come from the body above transmitted through the shank to the talus?
P.S. Cycling shoes had a stiff shank before cleated pedals were invented and cleated shoes release from the pedal when you twist.
Do you think the interface pressure between the foot and the 3/4 orthosis would equal zero in a training shoe when cycling?
Simon
I was thinking of rearfoot to forefoot deformation relationship. IE about the mid tarsal joint. If however the model is looked at as deformation about the 1st cuneiform-navicular joint then there could be a splinting effect of the foot -shoe -orthosis laminate. I think however in regard to the mid tarsal joint the frontal plane twisting torque may be more relevant in reducing arch flattening ie supination of the fore foot on the rearfoot.
The three forces required to bend the foot (diagram1) are the pedal reaction force, body weight force and achilles tendon force. There is no equivalent achilles tendon force on the shoe and orthosis. There are three forces present about the Nav-cuneiform joint however (diag 2) - bodyweight, shoe sole and lace forces.
Diagram 3 indicates that the cleat and padal forces react agaist the heel shoe counter forces causing a torque in the shank. This torque will be much higher with less displacement if the shoe shank is reinforced and has an orthotic shell in it.
Without the cleat (diag 4) the foot can only rotate about the forefoot contact point on th epedal eg the 1st mpj.
Dave
PS right click on the image to print or save for easier viewing
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Do you think the interface pressure between the foot and the 3/4 orthosis would equal zero in a training shoe when cycling?
Yes - there is no significant interface pressure. Right now I have orthoses in my shoe and staning on the ball of my foot I can twist my foot around and feel the orthosis sliding quite freely about my plantar foot. There is also a small gap (several mm) between orthosis and foot heel.
Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
At the weekend I used a pair of Cat walking shoes with a stiff, thick sole and probably a bit more roomy than the original shoes in the toe box. Outcome was no pain.
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
The Following User Says Thank You to David Smith For This Useful Post:
Recently (last 6 months) I have been using the bike to improve my fitness.
I usually do between 2 and 4 hours (20 - 45miles) over hilly terrain on and off road. I tend to pedal with just the ball of my foot on the pedal. However since last week, after about 1 hour riding I get a really excruciating burning, stabbing pain in, what feels like the 4th 5th digits. Getting off the bike and standing immediately relieves the pain and if I walk around for 30 seconds or so I can cycle for another hour.
I am assuming there is irritation of the digital nerve in the 3rd interspace since squeezing it reproduces the pain but more in the 4th toe.
What kind of modification can I make either in shoe or to the pedal to relieve this.
It does not hurt at all when walking but then I do not walk for hours at a time since I have a spinal stenosis that prevents me doing this.
Cheers Dave
Dave:
Interdigital neuritis/neuroma is one of the most common foot complaints in cyclists. This is generally due to shoes which are too tight causing increased pressure on the interdigital nerve due to excessive medial to lateral compressive forces from the shoe upper. The best solution is to get the widest shoe that will fit your foot and/or size up a half shoe size to increase shoe width. Also it may be helpful to take out your orthosis and just add a metatarsal pad inside the shoe and replace the insole with a thinner insole to give the shoe more volume. Evaluate shoe fit always with the socks that you will be riding in and with the foot weightbearing. You should be able to "pinch" some shoe upper dorsally over the metatarsal heads if the upper isn't too tight on the foot. It is amazing how quickly the pain resolves once the tight shoe source of mechanical compression to the interdigital nerve is removed. This is the same basic philosophy I use in treating interdigital neuromas in women (or men) wearing slip on shoes.....get them out of the tight shoes!!
__________________
Sincerely,
Kevin
**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College
Had similar digital neuralgia which was relieved by changing the bike seat (but no change in set-up). Impingement at ischial tuberosity??
Adam I believe that it is actually the pudendal nerve and /or artery that is affected by the seat in cycling. I know a number of cyclists that have had this problem and it is not a pleasant feeling from what I am told. You can actually damage your reproductive capability if you ignore this symptom.
__________________
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright
Other modifications one can consider for interdigital neuritis/neuroma while cycling is to:
1) move the cleat on the sole of the cycling shoe as posterior as possible in order to shift the pedal reaction forces more posteriorly on the foot;
2) cut a 1/8" (3 mm) thick adhesive felt pad that ends distally at the metatarsal necks and proximally at the midtarsal joint level and adhere it to the cycling shoe insole;
3) increase the cadence of cycling so that a lower gear may be used and less force is thus required at the pedal/shoe interface. Generally, 90 revolutions per minute is considered to be a relatively good cadence to cycle at (this cadence will, of course, change depending on individual riding styles); and
4) make a custom foot orthosis that has increased thickness at the anterior edge and ends slightly more distal than normal to transfer plantar reaction forces from the metatarsal heads and toward the distal metatarsal shafts.
Hope this helps.
__________________
Sincerely,
Kevin
**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College
Late posting I know, but my experiences with this are that lateral forefoot posting does work very well, however if the shoe is too narrow initially at the level of the met heads then any additional padding will be no better (possibly worse).
A lot of clients don't like admitting it, but often they are sold the flashest shoe by an over zealous shop staff member who just sees the cool features but not the suitability to the wearer ($500+ mistakes). I have sent a number of people back to change to a more appropriate shoe
Good cycle shoes for wide feet - Northwave (especially those with mesh adjacent to the met heads), the Northwave tribal is a triathlon shoe and definitely the widest I could find. Other brands include Shimano and Lake.
Bad cycle shoes for wide feet - Specialized, Nike, Sidi, Gaerne
Foot traffic Hi, you can never be too late with new information.
Many of us trawl through threads as we come across things that we have not dealt with before, does not matter when the info arrived on arena we can still use it so a big thanks for thi s
What part of NZ are you in?
I am visitiong later this year and hoping to meet and greet some pods while I am there if I can find any takers
Cheers
__________________
Heather J Bassett
137 Wheatsheaf Road
Glenroy 3046
Victoria
Australia
Cheers,
That would be great for you to visit here.
We are based in Glendowie - Auckland.
I'm sure there will be other Kiwi Pods keen to make you aquaintance.
Keep in touch
The Following User Says Thank You to Foot Traffic For This Useful Post:
This is an expensive sport mate. My bike is close on $NZ11000 (sponsored rider thankfully), and that is certainly not the most expensive around.
As for the shoes - a pair of sparkely new Sidi Genius Carbons bedecked in World Champion colours will cost well over $500.
I have worked closely in the past with a Bike shoe importer here in NZ who stocked a shoe with a mouldable carbon sole which was $NZ900. Strange thing was they had to be cooked in the oven to an optimal temperature and then moulded around the cyclists foot to provide the "necessary support"!! Thing is, even as a Sports Podiatrist I had trouble manipulating the sole once heated and I couldn't even be sure if I was achieving what I wanted to. Not sure how the shop staff can be confident selling them but a few were sold - that scenario sets up an interesting argument about who should be in control of dispensing such equipment!
I certainly was in 2 minds about putting someones $900 shoes in an oven.
Needless to say the shoes aren't being sold here anymore.
The Following User Says Thank You to Foot Traffic For This Useful Post: