Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
I have a patient, male 56 years old, who 15 years ago fractured both ankles in a motor bike accident. He now suffers severe 'ankle' pain during ambulation bilateral but worse l/f.
He has recently been thru the medical route and only has analgesia and anti imflammatories as a result.
In his biomechanical exam I noted that the left STJ was rigid and the right was reasonably normal in quality and range of movement. Left and right mid foot rom was restricted in both feet but worse l/f. I ordered x rays, which showed complete degeneration of the l/f STJ and substantial degeneration of the r/f stj. Right mid foot had mild degeneration and left mid foot had severe degeneration with no distiction of joint space in any joint. Both talo-crural joints are in good condition and have good clinical presentation and RoMs.
I propose to fit soft accomodative orthoses to reduce moments about the STJ and increase shock attenuation in addition to rocker type shoes to reduce dorsiflexion moments about the midtarsal joint.
I have advised referal to orthopaedics with a view to surgery in the future, possibly arthrodesis. What type of surgery would you envisage, if any.
Cheers Dave Smith
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
I have a patient, male 56 years old, who 15 years ago fractured both ankles in a motor bike accident. He now suffers severe 'ankle' pain during ambulation bilateral but worse l/f.
He has recently been thru the medical route and only has analgesia and anti imflammatories as a result.
In his biomechanical exam I noted that the left STJ was rigid and the right was reasonably normal in quality and range of movement. Left and right mid foot rom was restricted in both feet but worse l/f. I ordered x rays, which showed complete degeneration of the l/f STJ and substantial degeneration of the r/f stj. Right mid foot had mild degeneration and left mid foot had severe degeneration with no distiction of joint space in any joint. Both talo-crural joints are in good condition and have good clinical presentation and RoMs.
I propose to fit soft accomodative orthoses to reduce moments about the STJ and increase shock attenuation in addition to rocker type shoes to reduce dorsiflexion moments about the midtarsal joint.
I have advised referal to orthopaedics with a view to surgery in the future, possibly arthrodesis. What type of surgery would you envisage, if any.
Cheers Dave Smith
David
So, to read into what you are saying...your diagnosis is?
The most objective information you provide relates to likely post-traumatic degenerative joint disease affecting the subtalar joints and "midfoot" (whatever that is).
Post the x-rays, but reading between the lines this person might end up requiring bilateral triple arthrodesis...not an enviable thought.
I would ditch the accomodative route in preference to deep UCBL devices to immobilise the hindfoot as much as possible. Rocker-boots are not indicated if there is no sagittal block (ie ankle and 1st MTPJ function is normal).
LL
__________________
***************************************** Remember, it's just a foot.
The Following User Says Thank You to LuckyLisfranc For This Useful Post:
I would ditch the accomodative route in preference to deep UCBL devices to immobilise the hindfoot as much as possible. Rocker-boots are not indicated if there is no sagittal block (ie ankle and 1st MTPJ function is normal).
I was thinking of a ucbl type shape but in EVA for increased shock attenuation.
The rocker shoe would not be a surgical or orthopaedic type but instead a walking shoe or boot with a rockered sole. This will reduce dorsiflexion moments about the the midfoot, which includes all joints from talo navicular and calcaneo-cuboid to met-cuneiforms. If the customer will wear boots then this would help to reduce STJ moments in the frontal plane.
Thanks for the input all the best Dave Smith
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Hi David:
Sounds as though the original injury was a fall or MVA causing compression (B) ?
It also sounds as though he had a Fx of the STJ as well as the ankles.
As you probably are aware it's better to have no motion in the STJ then a small amount of painful motion. It sounds as though (unless the Midtarsals were injured as well) that the compensatory forces from decreased STJ motion has caused degenerative changes in the Midtarsal joints.
If the arthritis is as bad as I envision, STJ/Ankle fusion via intermedullary pin is available (when all else fails).
Can you upload an xray?
Steve
__________________
DrSArbes
Fellow American College of Foot & Ankle Surgeons
Board Certified Foot & Ankle Surgery, ABPS
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
As you probably are aware it's better to have no motion in the STJ then a small amount of painful motion. It sounds as though (unless the Midtarsals were injured as well) that the compensatory forces from decreased STJ motion has caused degenerative changes in the Midtarsal joints.
Absolutely
Quote:
Can you upload an xray?
Yer tis!
Thanks for your interest Steve
Cheers Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Amazingly the reproduction on the Arena page is better than on the computer I read it on
Due to the CD format supplied I was only able to read the x rays on a very old computer. I copied the images and uploaded them to my computer via email then posted them via tiny pic.
Nowt's easy eh!
Dave
__________________
Descartes seems to consider here that beliefs formed by pure reasoning are less doubtful than those formed through perception.
Looks like your patient had a compression (i.e. joint depression type) fracture of the calcaneus, worse on the left.
The ankle looks good (B)
He's getting secondary arthritis in the TN and CC joints left.
As always happens when not treated with ORIF the body of the calc widened and now he has an obvious impingement of the distal Fib head, Lt.
It looks as though he might (big might) have gotten away with a simple Fx posterior process on the right talus - although there is evidence of a depression Fx of the posterior facet as well (healed fracture line in the body of the calcaneus)
TREATMENT:
Depending on his symptoms, he's a candidate for a triple on the left.
Tx for the right most likely orthotic control (for now).
If he had ankle symptoms I would guess it's simple synovitis. His left TNJ will get worse with time is not fused.
This is probably all pretty obvious.
Good luck.
Steve
__________________
DrSArbes
Fellow American College of Foot & Ankle Surgeons
Board Certified Foot & Ankle Surgery, ABPS
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA