We forget that the precise mechanism by which many medications work is sometimes a mystery and yet these meds are approved, often being suggested for off-label use. Why is it such a stretch for some people to believe that food and supplements are efficacious (possibly a drug in therapeutic doses) given the amount of documented research on its effect in certain disease states and deficiency syndromes?
BTW Phil, in my course of training nutritional intervention was part of the curriculum, two full semesters specific to managing or co-managing patient's actually. There is also a post-graduate program in clinical nutrition offered to DC's. It is an integral part of what I offer my patients and afforded as first line therapy (and not just by DC's) to type II diabetics, burn patients, the obese, in malabsorption syndrome, syndrome X, iron deficiency anemia, scurvy, B-12 neuropathy etc.
I can be much more specific on how certain neutriceuticals have a major impact on just the resting state of skeletal muscle in acute or chronic low back pain or how nutrition effects tendons and ligaments in sprain injuries and how this benefits healing time if anyone is interested. It is science validated with clinical research not Chiropractic.
The subject was the Podiatric profession as a model for the Chiropractic profession to improve its professional standing. I believe there are many errors though in this article, the most glaring error is that Chiropractic is not allopathic in nature, which is obvious nor should they try to be. It is a distinct, natural healing art, non-invasive and effective when utilized in a manner consistent with its benefit and limitations. One of those limitations is being politically inept enough to distance themselves from mainstream colleges and the medical community at large and practice fringe philosophical elements with zero research to support it.
I do not wholly agree that our market share is dwindling, in fact visits to "complementary and alternative" providers is in fact on the rise and has been for several years. There are also demographic reasons why the data suggests a decline in utilization in the U.S., while there has been an increase worldwide.
There is one interesting statistic a colleague sent me in reference to this article. In one study 35% of the U.S. population is thought to see their primary care MD every year at least for a check-up. If the reported average of 7.5% utilization for the DC practitioner is correct and there are 11 times more MD's practicing in the country, than the DC providers actually sees more patients per annum on the average.
To respond to Lorraine I am proud to be able to personally point out many children that I have encountered in practice with ADD who have been able to abstain from taking stimulant medication to address their disorder. Many of these just by taking a high-dose Omega 3 preparation. I know that I may hear it for making this statement but I am also an ADHD sufferer who was helped greatly by nutrition and refused to take methylphenidate and amphetamine medication.
Regards,
