Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Having been shunted into the HPC I find it difficult to understand we are not more vocal about the position that podiatry finds itself in.Although many of us were unhappy about the whole concept of the HPC most of us thought it would unite the profession and provide more protection for the public. Several years down the line, it is quite obvious that it has done neither of these things. Perhaps someone will explain to me why a profession which successfully introduced surgery into podiatry against all the odds and the dire warning of the medical profession cannot,in the near future, rid itself of this sad organisation whose main raison d'etre seems to be keeping a small army of administrators in work.
The cheeky side of me says that the reason that the HPC (and similar bodies worldwide) are going to be around for a while are that they are not there to meet the needs of the profession. Any lobbying by any profession is not going to be given a lot of weight as it will be seen as self-serving. Bureaucrats (love em or hate em) are not stupid and know the context of any self serving lobbying when they formulate advice to Ministers. The only way I can see for it to be changed is if solid evidence (not wishful thinking, anecdotes or sensationalism) can be provided of the harm its doing to the consumer.
>The only way I can see for it to be changed is if solid evidence (not wishful thinking, anecdotes or sensationalism) can be provided of the harm its doing to the consumer.
Who exactly do you report this to? It appears there is no mechanisim. (See correspondence on sister theme). This would imply there is no intention to do anything other than what the Government want to do. Big Borther is not just on the box it seems it seems to be alive and well in democracy.
I really do not believe that professional self interest is incompatible with public protection. Surely the whole point of setting up the HPC was to regulate, set minimun standards for the profession and protect the public.So the legislators must have thought it a good idea that our profession be properly educated why otherwise would they bother? It would seem that in future there will not be an even playing field. Those registered with the HPC will have to undertake regular cpe and be subject to inspection by Care Standards, and for that we will have the privilege of a recognised title. Those outside the register will not be subject to these restrictions and it cannot be right that the government continue to ignore this disparity. Part closure is not working.
I really do not believe that professional self interest is incompatible with public protection
But the bureaucrats do not see it that way - they see a profession who wants to get rid of or control the competition. They see competiton as a good thing as it keep prices down, therefore benefiting the consumer. As I said above:
Quote:
The only way I can see for it to be changed is if solid evidence (not wishful thinking, anecdotes or sensationalism) can be provided of the harm its doing to the consumer.
I totally agree with you here:
Quote:
It would seem that in future there will not be an even playing field.
But unless harm to the consumer can be demonstrated by those not doing CPD etc, then its going to be an uphill battle.
I do not disagree with you .... but we just have to understand it from the bureaucrats point of view.
The registered profession have fought many uphill battles in the past and in the
CPSM at least we knew where we stood as a profession.Now we have to contend with individuals who have been grandfathered in teaching and promoting a group of people that we are told will never be registerable, and not be subject to any controls.I have always been for a once and for all inclusive act however we are now in a position where a minority of registrants are undermining the system by teaching and promoting what is in effect podiatry by another name and even the most blinkered bureaucrats will eventually see this must be a nonsense.I have asked the HPC about this problem and have had no firm reply, which leads me to believe that they are considering it.
Plagued with viruses at the moment so could not give much thought to your question.
As I understand the situation, entry to the ARU conversion program was dependent upon students being registered with HPC i.e grand parented pods. The conversion program was an academic qualification which on completion gave you parity with other podiatry graduates. As part of the conversion program there was a component relating to local anaesthesia and this was separately accredited by HPC (because it contained practical elements). Provided you were successful and passed all the modules then then you were awarded an unclassified degree (an academic qualification) by the university.
Status as a registered pod would not change with the degree award but the practical LA module would prepare the successful candidate(s)to increase their clinical scope of practice.
Thank you Cameron yes I have only one year left to complete, and the course has opened up a pandoras box in knowledge and learning. Although I do stuggle (dyslexia rules) (no spell check on your tool bar), I am enjoying, don't know how I practiced before. As I said I will be in a void - HPC registered with a BSc Hon's but not registered. This is not going to cause a problem to me in private practice, my patients have already voted with their feet with a successful bussiness but yet another rift in the profession.
Jack I am still in the opinion it is still early days for the HPC. I myself have been a Health Professional since 1972 in the days we were just taught to diagnose and treat, as with most professions, with no regulations to update. The idea of CPD is good although the quality of courses on the market do vary. I can see your frustration but I am stiving to become informed, updated and educated, do not put us all in the same box.
If you go on from the foundation degree to a BSc (Hons), then you will be in precisely the same position as any chiro/pod who has gone through the 3/4 year system. I commend you for your studies and sincerely hope that your hard work results in satisfaction. Trouble is, the wider the shore of knowledge, the farther the horizon of learning!
David spot on and I can only be an associate member (AChS) of the society not SChS which I am already, but dose not change either after the degree because it is not a reconised course. The degree itself is BSc (Hons) Health Care Practices (Podiatry), and the modules all relivant to podiatry. My son who qualified two years ago says we are studying to a much higher level.
But again it is very early days and I am on the first wave that will be qualifying 2007, so maybe it will be our mission to initiate change, dont know how many are even on the top up degree.
The membership status for grandparented podiatrists changed last Saturday following the Society's AGM. Contact Elaine Garnett (0845 450 3741 eg@scpod.org) or Tamsyn Hutchins (0845 450 3722 th@scpod.org) for details. You may find your membership is upgraded automatically.
Regards
Mark Russell
__________________
"citing an indisposition due to special circumstances"
Judith. You can certainly apply for, and almost certainly will be accepted as a full member of the Institute. You can, of course, continue as a full member of the the British Association. There may well be other organisations out there of which I know nothing. However, it's good to know you're popular isn't it?
2 years ago i voted against membership for the grandparented as they achieved this status by filling in a form and not bouncing a cheque for £200.00
Hardly rigorous. Still many bleated loud and long about this gift.
So this time round the responsible ambitious and committed grandparented have shown their future by upgrading their training etc etc.
So i voted in favour this time.
So we now have the motivated pods being able to choose to join the SCP which i hope will be the Foremost professional body with the most motivated and progressive practitioners.
Those grandparented who feel they got nothing of benefit from HPC reg will de register and practice as FHP.
THose practitioners are not the future of the profession of Podiatry and are not who I personally want as memebers of SCP.
regards David
as an aside your lack of affection for the SCP is obvious and i feel not an attractive part of your usually positive and constructive comments on the various forums.
Thank boys have emailed the society and await their reply. On a lighter note I leave you all for a few weeks as seeing 'Elvis' the stage play tonight also have some serrious shopping to do in Camden tomorrow, and an essay to hone in the next few weeks.
Health Professions Council
hpc
Linear Mode
