Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags:

Variation of stump volume

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st June 2006, 12:19 PM
javier javier is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 849
Join Date: Jan 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 71 Times in 59 Posts
Default Variation of stump volume

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
Dear all,

I would like to share some concerns about transmetatarsal amputation prosthetics due to a difficult case.

Sometimes there are variations of stump volume after transmetatarsal amputation. For example, I have the case of a 60 year old man, diabetic with peripheral vascular disease. A transmetatarsal amputation was performed 8 weeks ago. He came to our center 3 weeks ago for prosthetic. A foot prosthetic was manufactured but the patient has come complaining about pain on the stump. After evaluation, it was noted that a variation of stump volume was present.

Since, it is not an uncommon circumstance. I would like to ask you if there are any predictors for these volume variations. I have not found information on the literature.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 3rd June 2006, 02:59 PM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 12,002
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 53% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 491 Times in 402 Posts
Default

Not directly related to the above, there may be something here that helps:

Can partial foot prostheses effectively restore foot length?
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 Apr;30(1):17-23
Dillon MP, Barker TM
Quote:
Our understanding of how partial foot prostheses function stems from static force analyses, where assumptions about the location of the ground reaction force during terminal stance have been made. While such assumptions seemed reasonably based on an understanding of normal gait, they are often illogical based on what is observed clinically. As such, the aim of this work was to evaluate the belief that partial foot prostheses are able to restore the effective foot length. Centre of pressure (CoP) excursion data were collected as part of a complete gait analysis incorporating an Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. force platform. The CoP excursion patterns, observed in a cohort of eight partial foot amputees and matched control subjects, highlight the inability of toe fillers and slipper sockets to restore the 'effective' foot length in transmetatarsal and Lisfranc amputees, whereas clamshell prostheses fitted to the Chopart amputees were able to restore the effective foot length. In the transmetatarsal and Lisfranc amputees, the observed CoP excursion patterns could indicate a learned gait strategy necessary to reduce the requirement of the weak triceps surae musculature as well as spare the sensitive distal stump from extreme forces. The toe fillers and slipper sockets fitted to these amputees may not be stiff enough to support the amputee's body weight or the device may not be designed appropriately to assist the weakened triceps musculature to resist the external moments caused by loading the forefoot. The clamshell prostheses restored the 'effective' foot length due to the rigid toe lever and clamshell socket, which could allow and comfortably support the generation of substantial external moments during terminal stance.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bojsen-Mollers high gear/low gear Craig Payne Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 51 9th August 2009 12:38 PM
The Foot Hylton Menz Journals Online 13 2nd December 2008 05:42 PM
STJ axis variation makes it into mainstream biomechanics literature Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 6 26th April 2006 06:30 AM
Hourly variation in joint ROM davidh Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 4 2nd June 2005 11:23 PM
Interclinician variation in diabetes foot assessment- a national lottery? Admin Diabetic Foot & Wound Management 1 24th January 2005 02:53 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:30 PM.