Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
As Stated by David Smith on His “New Goals for Podiatric Biomechanics” Thread recommended on this thread for students:
“Obviously some seriously doubt the validity of the Root STJ neutral theory and measuring foot angles and positions as has been highlighted by recent discussions. Is the tide of opinion turning and are we being too slow to evolve for the future. If too many learned and well known podiatrists and establishments insist on sticking with the Dogma of Root is the only model, Kevin Kirby, Craig Payne, DanenBurgh, Eric Fuller et al will be fighting a difficult battle. Am I being too dramatic? I think not.”
I personally cannot agree more and since unlike him, I continue to not be able to absorb the language and the expanding yet unproven questions that the models of rotational equilibrium, tissue stress and saggital plane progression produce that act as a diversion for clinical development and application which is where I subjectively opine that this paradigm falls short. Furthermore, there are many others who cannot grasp the complexity of your paradigm.
I ask one simple question to all students The Arena from the new convert all the way up to Dr. Kirby, what if this method, like Dr’ Roots is eventually proven flawed and none others have been examined?
In reviewing the list of recommended threads for students, I find that purposefully leaving out other paradigms that have been raised from “Root Doubt” and have developed a following should be examined as they may offer additional direction or insight and if nothing else, would keep the developing paradigm honest. Bullying them from your radar screen and denying them exposure is not very scientific or academic.
Every time I see a posting from Dr. Kirby stating that a comment made is “100% right”, it makes me shudder to think where that type of subjective power when applied to students looking for a new direction over many years can lead an academic community.
I am currently involved on an Arena thread called Functional Foot Typing that has over 2000 viewings.
It reflects another new and fresh paradigm of biomechanics called Neoteric Biomechanics.
I wonder why this site and others like it (if they exist) aren’t included as recommended for students in order to air adjacent theories?
What if practicing Neoteric Biomechanics, a more simplistic approach to foot and postural care, allowed some of those those involved to become desirous of examining an even more complex approach and seriously took a look at yours. Wouldn’t it serve a purpose?
I wonder why this site and others like it (if they exist) aren’t included as recommended for students in order to air adjacent theories?
Probably because we haven't taken the time to update the Threads Recommended for Students in quite a while - the last time we looked for threads to add was Dec last year. All threads are candidates to be added when we next get around to it. There are just a lot of other priorities involved in running this site.
Incidently, we may be getting rid of this Threads recommended for students all together. This thread was started before we implemented the thread tags. There is one on clinical biomechanical theories, of which the thread on Functional Foot Typing is part of. The thread tags have sort of superseded the need for threads that collect recommended threads.
Five months ago, The Editor wrote in reply to my posting stating that other points of view were being denied exposure to the open minds of students and new practitioners on this thread and that this is dangerous to free thinking.
The Editor Wrote in reply:
Incidently, we may be getting rid of this Threads recommended for students all together. This thread was started before we implemented the thread tags. There is one on clinical biomechanical theories, of which the thread on Functional Foot Typing is part of. The thread tags have sort of superseded the need for threads that collect recommended threads.
1. This thread still exists
2. The MASS thread was locked by The Editor on Dec 9th
3. The Functional Foot Typing thread was locked by the editor on Dec 9th
4. Challenging MASS was locked by The Editor on Dec 9th
5. Challenging SALRE was locked by The Editor on Dec 9th
Is there a pattern here being fostured to stifle free thought about Biomechanics?
Is this what a Podiatry Arena should be about?
“Freedom is not merely the opportunity to do as one pleases; neither is it merely the opportunity to choose between set alternatives. Freedom is, first of all, the chance to formulate the available choices, to argue over them -- and then, the opportunity to choose”. C. Wright Mills
Dennis
As I saw it all the aforementioned threads were locked once the discussions drifted away from the thought provoking in-depth discussion of merits/limitations of various theories that was intended, and became nothing more than exchanges of insults between the differing 'camps'.
Contrary to what you believe most of us are more than happy to listen to and discuss new ideas; and free thought is encouraged on this forum - not stifled as you suggest. What most people here won't tolerate is paradigms or theories which their 'inventor' seems unable or unwilling to answer questions about when asked, as he appears to only be here to defame others and promote his own financial gain.
You may also be interested to know that 'the editor' of this website fully acknowledges you and covers your theory/paradigm during his very highly regarded bootcamps. So you may still get to rule the world one day...
Threads only ever get locked when:
- they stop being productive
- no new information gets added
- old ground is gone over again
- when the insults start.
Threads recommended for students
Re: Threads recommended for students
Linear Mode
