Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags: , , ,

Heel lifts for limited ankle dorsiflexion

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd June 2006, 12:18 PM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 3,822
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 97 Posts
Default Heel lifts for limited ankle dorsiflexion

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
Heel lifts and the stance phase of gait in subjects with limited ankle dorsiflexion.
J Athl Train. 2006 Apr-Jun;41(2):159-65
Quote:
Context: Heel lifts are often prescribed as part of the treatment program for patients with overuse injuries associated with limited ankle dorsiflexion. However, little is known about how joint kinematics and temporal variables are affected by heel lifts.

Objective: To determine the effects of heel lifts on selected lower extremity kinematic and temporal variables during the stance phase of gait in subjects with limited ankle dorsiflexion.

Design: Two-way, fully repeated-measures design. The 2 factors were side (right or left) and walking condition (shoes alone, 6-mm heel lifts in shoes, 9-mm heel lifts in shoes). Setting: University biomechanics laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-six volunteers (21 females, 5 males) with no more than 5 degrees of ankle joint dorsiflexion. Intervention(s): Subjects were tested in shoes alone and in shoes with 6-mm and 9-mm heel lifts. Main Outcome Measure(s): We used the Qualisys Motion Analysis System to measure ankle dorsiflexion excursion, maximal knee extension, and time to heel off during the stance phase of gait under the 3 walking conditions.

Results: On the right side, ankle dorsiflexion excursion increased significantly with the 6-mm and 9-mm heel lifts compared with shoes alone ( P < .05). On the left side, ankle dorsiflexion increased significantly with the 9-mm heels lifts over shoes alone and with the 9-mm heel lifts compared with the 6-mm heel lifts ( P < .05). Time to heel off increased significantly for walking with the 9-mm heel lifts compared with shoes alone ( P < .05). No differences were noted for maximal knee extension ( P > .05).

Conclusions: Clinicians may consider prescribing heel lifts for patients with limited dorsiflexion range of motion if increasing ankle dorsiflexion excursion and time to heel off during the stance phase of gait may be beneficial.
__________________
Who is NewsBot?
Buy Admin a Beer
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 23rd June 2006, 12:48 PM
Admin2's Avatar
Admin2 Admin2 is offline
Administrator
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 1,722
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Related threads:
Lunge test- Please explain...
Lunge Test - normal range
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3rd July 2006, 01:35 PM
Admin's Avatar
Admin Admin is offline
Administrator
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 2,132
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 124 Times in 77 Posts
Default

The full text of this article is here:
http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/article...medid=16791300
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th August 2006, 07:09 AM
User7 User7 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 18
Join Date: May 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Just read the full text and was struck by the fact that mean passive dorsiflexion was < 5 deg., while (in all test conditions) mean dorsiflexion was about 20 degrees or more.

Can anyone help me out with an explanation? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7th August 2006, 01:05 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,108
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Default

No explanation for it, but seen it many times in different projects. Seen some who have large range passively. but never go past, for eg, 5 degrees when walking; then seen others with very limited ROM, but dynamically, they easily go past 10 degrees.

CONCLUSION: Static ankle ROM has nothing to do with what is used dynamically.
__________________
Craig Payne
Department of Podiatry
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/podiatry
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
The views expressed above are those of the author and not that of La Trobe University
This is where I am, where are you?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7th August 2006, 08:02 PM
Kevin Kirby's Avatar
Kevin Kirby Kevin Kirby is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,120
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 309 Times in 209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by User7
Just read the full text and was struck by the fact that mean passive dorsiflexion was < 5 deg., while (in all test conditions) mean dorsiflexion was about 20 degrees or more.

Can anyone help me out with an explanation? Thanks.
Read the methods section of the paper more closely and you will find that the researchers measured passive dorsiflexion when clinically examining the subjects and then measured "ankle dorsiflexion excursion" (difference of maximum vs minimum ankle motion) when studying the kinematics of gait. In other words, ankle dorsiflexion and ankle dorsiflexion excursion are two totally different measures and should not be compared against each other.
__________________
Sincerely,

Kevin

**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College

e-mail: kevinakirby@comcast.net

Private Practice:
107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
My location

Voice: (916) 925-8111 Fax: (916) 925-8136
**************************************************
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th August 2006, 01:12 AM
Asher Asher is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 342
Join Date: Jun 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I have read a lot recently about the lunge test since I heard about it at your Foot Orthoses Seminar Craig (BTW, the seminar was excellent).

Although much less experienced / learned than many, I have a bit of trouble getting used to the idea of putting a heel raise in a shoe / on an orthotic as a first line of treatment when AJ range is limited. My instinct is to try and increase that range with stretches, mobilisations, night splints, etc rather than accommodate that lack of range and potentially cause further tightness / stiffness.

I appreciate any comments.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plantar fat pad properties NewsBot General Issues and Discussion Forum 13 22nd July 2009 05:29 PM
Maintenance of Balance in Relaxed Bipedal Standing Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 8 13th December 2005 08:52 AM
New Surgical Technique Repairs Arthritic Ankle Damage Admin Foot Surgery 2 28th November 2005 11:39 PM
Variability and Foot Biomechanics Ian Linane Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 25 3rd September 2005 01:12 AM
When a joint doesn't move? Paul R. Scherer, D.P.M. Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 4 14th August 2005 10:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:55 AM.