Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags: ,

Forced to 'shut up shop'

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th November 2006, 07:19 AM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 3,822
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 97 Posts
Default Forced to 'shut up shop'

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
Portsmouth Today are reporting:
Sole trader forced to shut up shop
Quote:
A CHIROPODIST whose lifelong ambition was to set up her own clinic has been forced to close – because of a planning blunder.
Wendy Heath, 42, leased an empty shop in Elm Grove, Hayling Island, and set up her business Sole to Soul offering customers a wide range of foot therapies.
She spent her life savings fitting up the clinic and it opened last month.
But after three weeks Havant Borough Council told her she did not have the right planning permission to run a foot clinic at the premises.
However, Mrs Heath claims she sought advice from Havant Borough Council before leasing the building.
She said: 'I have worked really hard to get where I am and I have been kicked in the teeth. I have lost all my customers.
'When you build a business from nothing, it takes time to grow.
'Now I am left with nothing except a total mess.'
The council said Sole to Soul was 'trading illegally' because Mrs Heath had not applied for planning permission for a change of use on the unit, from 'retail' to 'other' – which neither the owner of the property, or Mrs Heath, knew anything about.
Mrs Heath said more should be done to inform landlords and people starting new businesses about local planning guidance to avoid the same happening again.
'All shopkeepers or owners of retail units in the area should know how strict the planning rules are,' she said.
'At the moment I don't think they do and I think similar shops may be breaching planning laws without knowing it.'
Havant council told her she could carry on trading while she put in an application for a change of use, which costs £265.
But Mrs Heath said she could not afford an application for a change of use and an application was unlikely to be successful.
Council spokeswoman Jo Humphreys said: 'The person using the premises is responsible for checking the planning use. It definitely is not Havant Borough Council's mistake. We were following planning guidance.'
__________________
Who is NewsBot?
Buy Admin a Beer
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18th November 2006, 04:59 PM
Anne McLean Anne McLean is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 94
Join Date: Oct 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

A sad tale.

This highlights the necessity to do one's homework thoroughly and to have a sound business plan, allowing for unseen contingencies, prior to setting up in practice.

Anne
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19th November 2006, 07:29 AM
Jonathan Jonathan is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 52
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wendy, have you thought about retailling a few items(Creams, bracing, etc) and still provide your services? This way you could get around the 'change of use'.

Obviously your business rate will be higher, but as you will not be selling over £60,000 worth of creams (if you do let me know!) you would be vat exempt.

You would also keep business ticking over until you find a more suitable premises, keep your clients etc, and when you have found and moved in you could tell 'Portsmouth Today' about the happy ending - and get some free advertising etc.

Good luck

Jonathan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th November 2006, 09:56 AM
George Brandy George Brandy is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 133
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

I do have much sympathy with Wendy.

Obviously there has been a communication breakdown somewhere along the way between Havant Borough Council, Landlord and business owner.

I can't stress how important it is to take up any free advice there is available from the council planning officers, fire service, building regulators before you even contemplate starting work converting premises for business use. Many localities within the UK have business advice centres and it is all free.

Building inspectors, fire safety officers all come and visit premises and offer free advice....well, I say free; this is what we pay for when we pay our rates.

Forums such as this offer a wealth of support and advice.

I do wonder if Wendy's professional body offered any advice about setting up a business from scratch.

There are so many people out there willing to offer advice to "new to business" that all it takes is good research, lots of questions asked, lots of brains picked and this sorry tale would so easily have been avoided.

GB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th November 2006, 01:11 AM
davidh's Avatar
davidh davidh is offline
Moderator
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 632
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I have little sympathy with anyone in business who does not do their homework.

In this case a few hundred pounds would have secured the services of a solicitor who would have known the (elementary I would have thought) fact that you need change of use planning permission anywhere in England if Premises are to be used for a different type of trade.

The Landlord didn't know either?
Hmmmmm....

Regards,
David
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patient’s attendants forced to take amputated leg NewsBot Diabetic Foot & Wound Management 0 11th May 2006 04:46 PM
Closing shop to avoid G8 violence Admin United Kingdom 1 7th July 2005 12:55 AM
Docs work on monk who glued eyes shut Admin Break Room 0 5th March 2005 10:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 AM.