Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags: ,

Met Domes: (Why) Do they work?

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th February 2005, 05:25 AM
Atlas Atlas is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 424
Join Date: Jan 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default Met Domes: (Why) Do they work?

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
I used to think it was all about facilitating a transverse arch, put pods don't talk about this much at all?

Do we use them to reduce weightbearing on the middle met heads (2/3/4)? Do we use them when callus exist here; or just on the basis of symptomology?

Do they have a role in Morton's....?

Other threads/posts suggest that it augments windlass, and this makes sense as pressure under adjacent rays, should reduce GRF's under the 1st met head; thereby lessening the dorsi-flexion/forces of the 1st ray.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 9th February 2005, 08:10 AM
Cameron's Avatar
Cameron Cameron is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 585
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

>I used to think it was all about facilitating a transverse arch, put pods don't talk about this much at all?

The transverse arch was thought by latterday modernists to materialise only in morbid anatomy. In functinal anatomy the contact phase of the metatarsals was more like a garden rake with each metatarsal head touching the ground, as the body mass passed medially across the foot.

>Do we use them to reduce weightbearing on the middle met heads (2/3/4)? Do we use them when callus exist here; or just on the basis of symptomology?

If memory serves Ken Robertson (London) did some preliminary work many years ago with pressure plates and produced interesting data which he concluded confirmed it did not make any difference where 2-4 plantar felt metatarsal pads were placed on the foot ie. directly over the met/phalangeal joints, or proximal or distal to them, they all had the same effect in pressure distribution. Not sure whether they increased or decreased the plantar pressure. But based on that I would say met bars are no different to metatarsal pads in terms of effect. You can argue till the cows come home about how comfortable they are to stanfd on.

>Do they have a role in Morton's....?

If you are referring to Plantar digital neuritis see below.

>Other threads/posts suggest that it augments windlass, and this makes sense as pressure under adjacent rays, should reduce GRF's under the 1st met head; thereby lessening the dorsi-flexion/forces of the 1st ray.

I would agree any bulk or resitance to compression on the plantar surfaces (weightbearing) would assist in the windlass action. Whilst most concerns in literature relate to the first MPJ, I would think the same applies to all MPJs and collectively the turning effect these have, help resupinate the heel, once it leaves the ground. I believe silicone two props have exactly the same effect and have had remarkable success in symptom reduction with treating PDN with simple three toe props.

It is still not clearly established what the cause of this condition is and many cling to the idea it has something to do with late phase pronation. By encouraging resupination as above and witnessing reduction in symptoms would lead me to think the working diagnosis may hold water.

Cameron
Hey, what do I know
__________________

Cameron Kippen, Podologist and Shoe Historian




Cameron Kippen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9th February 2005, 12:43 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,108
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Post

It sure is the windlass. Met domes are one of the more effective ways to lower the force to get the windlass established....(plus all the other things that CK mentioned)
__________________
Craig Payne
Department of Podiatry
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/podiatry
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
The views expressed above are those of the author and not that of La Trobe University
This is where I am, where are you?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th February 2005, 05:39 PM
Atlas Atlas is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 424
Join Date: Jan 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Thanks Cameron.
Thread Starter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th February 2005, 11:24 AM
Kevin Kirby's Avatar
Kevin Kirby Kevin Kirby is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,121
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 309 Times in 209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas
I used to think it was all about facilitating a transverse arch, put pods don't talk about this much at all?

Do we use them to reduce weightbearing on the middle met heads (2/3/4)? Do we use them when callus exist here; or just on the basis of symptomology?

Do they have a role in Morton's....?

Other threads/posts suggest that it augments windlass, and this makes sense as pressure under adjacent rays, should reduce GRF's under the 1st met head; thereby lessening the dorsi-flexion/forces of the 1st ray.
Here in the States we call them metatarsal pads or cookies.

Metatarsal pads, just like any in-shoe padding system and/or foot orthosis will change the location, magnitude and temporal pattern of ground reaction forces (GRF) acting on the plantar foot. They can be used in any instance where the patient will benefit therapeutically without causing other gait pathology or other symptoms.

I use metatarsal pads commonly in treating plantar metatarsal head (or MPJ) pain (e.g. IPKs, capsulitis, plantar plate tears, etc), intermetatarsal neuromas and in metatarsal stress fractures. In metatarsal stress fractures, the apex of the pad should be just behind the fracture site to decrease the bending moment on the affected metatarsal ray so that less pain occurs and more rapid healing occurs.

In addition, they can be used to increase the plantar loading forces on the lesser metatarsal rays so that the first ray may receive less plantar loading force from the ground. This reduces the resting tensile force within the medial fibers of the central component of the plantar aponeurosis which inserts onto the sesamoids, which will, in many feet, reduce the force required on the plantar hallux during propulsion to initiate the Windlass Effect of Hicks. In this fashion, an appropriately placed metatarsal pad may function similar to a 2-5 metatarsal head extension on an orthosis (i.e. Dancer's pad) to reduce the GRF plantar to the first metatarsal head in the late midstance and early propulsive periods of gait. However, I have preferred the 2-5 forefoot extension to accomplish this goal for the last 20 years since patients generally find it much more comfortable than a metatarsal pad.
__________________
Sincerely,

Kevin

**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College

e-mail: kevinakirby@comcast.net

Private Practice:
107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
My location

Voice: (916) 925-8111 Fax: (916) 925-8136
**************************************************
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Festive Fules Mark Russell Break Room 6 26th December 2005 04:07 AM
Docs work on monk who glued eyes shut Admin Break Room 0 5th March 2005 10:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 PM.