Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LCBL
I am not aware of the extent of training that Pod's get in AFO's and their casting/use/.... etc.
However, this advice in this newsletter is dangerous. Poly AFO's are contraindicated for fluctuating oedema.
If you cast in the AM then the fit in the PM is constrictive leading to pressure on the leg.
If you cast in the PM then the AFO in the AM is loose leading to fiction/pressure sores as the leg 'moves' in the AFO.
These are not problems you want in a patient with fluctuating oedema.
|
After reading your post, the question I ask is how many non-Pods get training in treating fluctuating oedema???
I disagree with your statement that fluct oedema is a "contraindication". It is a precaution. This must be taken on a case-by-case basis. The mere fact that the oedema "fluctuates" suggests that it most likely can be managed with compression therapy.
There are many advantages to a MAFO compared to a double upright AFO- better hindfoot control, less heavy, less O2 consumption, concealable, less expensive, can be used with a variety of shoes, less stigma, better compliance, etc. Patients HATE double uprights.
Why not TREAT the oedema and order the MAFO in patients with low risk limbs. It will serve as a barometer and reinforcement for the oedema treatment. I do this quite often and have much success.
Nick