Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Aim To examine psychosocial adjustment in persons with lower limb amputations related to diabetes.
Methods Thirty-eight participants with diabetes-related lower limb amputations, recruited from two limb-fitting centres, completed three psychological self-report assessments: the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and the Amputation Body Image Scale—Revised (ABIS-R).
Results Over 18% of participants scored above the normal range (> 8) for depression on the HADS and 18.5% scored above the normal range for anxiety. Both depression (ρ = 0.75, P < 0.01) and anxiety (ρ = 0.62, P < 0.01) scores were significantly associated with body image disturbance, as measured using the ABIS-R. Significant relationships were also observed between body image disturbance and three TAPES subscales measuring psychosocial adjustment [general adjustment (ρ = −0.48, P < 0.01), social adjustment (ρ = −0.51, P < 0.01), adjustment to limitations (ρ = −0.45, P < 0.05)].
Conclusions Individuals with diabetes-related amputations may be at elevated risk for psychological distress as a result of their co-morbid medical condition. Regular screening for anxiety and depression and the provision of appropriate follow-up care may therefore be advisable in this population.
Purpose. To systematically review studies on quality of life (QoL) in lower limb amputees.
Method. Computerised literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PUBMED and PsycINFO databases was performed using the keywords, amputee, leg, knee, foot, amputation, QoL, prosthesis, orthopaedic equipment, ADL, phantom, mobility, rehabilitation, psychosocial, psychology and social. Eligible studies published from database inception through March 2009 were selected. The study was included if (1) the study population comprised of adolescent and adult lower-limb amputees as a group or a sub-group, and had ten or more subjects; (2) the study involved subjective assessment of QoL or self-appraisal of life or satisfaction with life; (3) the study was an empirical research study and (4) at least one of the study outcomes was QoL or self-appreciation of life, and QoL results were presented. The selected articles were assessed for study quality based on a standardised set of 19 criteria. The criteria list was pilot-tested for applicability and operationalisation by the authors. Objectives, study population description, QoL instruments used and study outcomes were summarised for the included studies.
Results. Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen studies were cross-sectional, four prospective, six retrospective and one mixed study-design. The studies were found to be heterogeneous with respect to the study objectives and instruments used to assess QoL. The summary quality score was 50% or more for ten studies, with the maximum being 81%.
Conclusions. Lacunas were found in the methodological and study population characteristics of most of the studies. Prospective longitudinal studies are envisaged to systematically study the events following amputation, and the change in QoL over time. To enable this, amputee specific standardised and validated QoL instruments are needed to capture the multitude of facets influencing QoL in amputees, and thereby, facilitating direct comparison across studies.
Depression is associated with a higher risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications and mortality in diabetes, but whether depression is linked to an increased risk of incident amputations is unknown. We examined the association between diagnosed depression and incident non-traumatic lower limb amputations in veterans with diabetes.
This was a retrospective cohort study from 2000-2004 that included 531,973 veterans from the Diabetes Epidemiology Cohorts, a national Veterans Affairs (VA) registry with VA and Medicare data. Depression was defined by diagnostic codes or antidepressant prescriptions. Amputations were defined by diagnostic and procedural codes. We determined the HR and 95% CI for incident non-traumatic lower limb amputation by major (transtibial and above) and minor (ankle and below) subtypes, comparing veterans with and without diagnosed depression and adjusting for demographics, health care utilization, diabetes severity and comorbid medical and mental health conditions.
Over a mean 4.1 years of follow-up, there were 1289 major and 2541 minor amputations. Diagnosed depression was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.33 (95% CI: 1.15-1.55) for major amputations. There was no statistically significant association between depression and minor amputations (adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13).
Diagnosed depression is associated with a 33% higher risk of incident major lower limb amputation in veterans with diabetes. Further study is needed to understand this relationship and to determine whether depression screening and treatment in patients with diabetes could decrease amputation rates.
Study design: Systematic review.
Background: Common beliefs about quality of life in people with partial foot and transtibial amputation are often described as passing comments in the literature with seeming little research evidence. A clear understanding of the research evidence is important to inform decisions about amputation level from a quality of life perspective.
Objective: To systematically gather and appraise research evidence comparing quality of life between persons with partial foot and transtibial amputation.
Methods: A comprehensive suite of databases (e.g. Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Web of Science) were searched using terms relating to amputation level and quality of life. Reference lists of articles that met the inclusion criteria were hand searched. Included studies reported quantitative data for persons with partial foot and transtibial amputation secondary to peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Studies were appraised using the McMaster University Critical Review form.
Results: There is insufficient evidence comparing quality of life in people with partial foot and transtibial amputation. The available evidence suggests that quality of life may be very similar in people with partial foot and transtibial amputation and the small differences are not likely to be clinically meaningful.
Conclusion: Without adequate evidence comparing quality of life in people with partial foot and transtibial amputation, it is difficult to inform decisions about amputation level from a quality of life perspective.
Clinical relevance There is insufficient evidence about differences in QoL between persons with PFA or TTA. Contrary to common belief, the available evidence suggests that QoL may be similar in persons with PFA and TTA. Further research is needed to inform decisions about amputation level from a QoL perspective.
To investigate differences between self-reported cognitive concerns in people with lower limb loss (LLL) and normative data derived from the U.S. general population. A secondary aim was to determine if there were cognitive differences based on amputation etiology or age.
A volunteer sample of 1086 persons with LLL resulting from trauma or dysvascular complications who regularly use a prosthetic limb.
Main Outcome Measure
The Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Applied Cognition General Concerns v1.0 Short Form (Neuro-QoL ACGC), an eight-item self-report measure of general cognitive concerns.
People with LLL reported significantly more cognitive concerns than the Neuro-Qol normative sample. Mean Neuro-QoL ACGC scores were significantly lower than normative values (p<0.001) across subgroups defined by age (i.e., <40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70+ years) and subgroups defined by etiology (i.e., traumatic and dysvascular LLL). However, there were no significant differences in cognitive concerns among age subgroups (p=0.84) or between the etiology subgroups (p=0.58).
When compared to the Neuro-QoL normative sample, individuals with LLL report greater concerns with cognitive health. Cognitive concerns were not differentially affected by age or cause of amputation. The presence of cognitive concerns in people with LLL suggests a need to assess perceived cognitive function in order to tailor education and training in prosthetic use and care.