Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags:

The New Foot Care Nurse... COMMENTS!

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th April 2005, 01:13 PM
pw079 pw079 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Join Date: Apr 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default The New Foot Care Nurse... COMMENTS!

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
What do all the podiatrists think of this:

Beginning in January 2005, the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing Certification Board (WOCNCB) is offering a new certification credential to Registered Nurses (RNs) who perform foot and nail care. The WOCNCB is dedicated to providing consumer safety and protection by offering this new credential – CFCN™ (Certified Foot Care Nurse). Please review this website for complete information on eligibility, educational preparation, exam content, review references, and the testing process.

http://www.wocncb.org/whatsnew/footnail.asp
__________________
Future DPM-Paul
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 3rd May 2005, 01:04 PM
random random is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default they will LOVE them

Coming out of school carrying a huge debt, it must just do the heart well to see folks with about a thrid of the training one has sweated through doing what you trained hard to do...wonderful they will be met with open arms!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th May 2005, 05:59 AM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

True, true, very true!!!!!!!!!!!

Regards,

Colin. (You wouldn't believe it but I got one of the 'trues' the wrong way round! You must pay attention here you know!).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th May 2005, 06:40 AM
W J Liggins W J Liggins is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,197
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 344 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Well, it looks like a good way of making money! Given the breadth and depth of the example questions, existing practitioners have nothing to fear. To paraphrase, 'Patients with heel spurs will most likely complain of severe pain on the bottom of the foot'. Clearly the examiners have no concept of singular and plural forms, let alone signs and symptoms of foot disorders.

I think that this must be equated to the increasing use of 'Foot Care Assistants' in the U.K. & Australasia, as well as the parallel situation with nurses in Canada. It may still be possible to manipulate the situation to the professions advantage.

Bill Liggins
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th May 2005, 08:04 AM
Mark Russell's Avatar
Mark Russell Mark Russell is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,140
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 299
Thanked 653 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W J Liggins
It may still be possible to manipulate the situation to the professions advantage.
Bill

Maybe. But that really depends on what you define as "the profession". There are two views on how the profession is developing. If you support the view that podiatrists are specialist practitioners in the medical and surgical care of the foot and lower limb then we will need to embrace assistants, nurses, volunteers and Irish navvies to fill the void the profession will leave. If you take the view that podiatrists are fundamentally general practitioners within an established discipline that has developed to such a degree that it now has its own specialist clinicians within the same church, then the introduction of assistants and nurses as autonomous practitioners, may very well have an negative impact on the livelihoods of many general podiatrists.

Do we consolidate, protect and develop the profession to address the demands from a growing foot health market or do we concentrate our focus of the profession on particular areas of the market we want for ourselves - and disregard the rest? Or do you think that by introducing assistants, we could do both?

Kind regards

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4th May 2005, 08:18 AM
steve_thaw steve_thaw is offline
Podiatry Arena Rookie
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Mark (& all)
I used to be a nurse and appreciate their value in areas only remotely podiatric. They are valuable members of the health profession but are traditionally ward-based and, as I know from experience, deal with bodily odours far worse than a 'smelly foot'. The danger of a nurse treating a patient's feet is a point of ethics and legality. The NHS should employ more qualified podiatrists rather than farm out responsibilities to others who have not the qualifications or experience to manage podiatric problems.
Faithfully, Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th May 2005, 12:38 PM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Professions Advantages!

Hi Bill, (A late general reply.).

1. Which profession will meet Patient Demand,

1). The NHS. Podiatrist who is virtually refusing to cut nails at this time. A request recently was put in to have their relatives nails cut in my local hospital. The relative was told it will take a very long time to arrange an appointment. It would be better to get your own Chiropodist to visit if you are prepared to pay for him!

2). The Private Podiatrist who will meet that demand because it is his bread and butter!

3). The Original Chiropodist will also still meet and supply services to meet the Demand! (Carefully negotiating the mine Field set up by Government under various guises no doubt?). I'm sure the HPC. is well aware of this situation!



2. 1). Definition of Chiropody is a specialty supplementary to medicine devoted to the care of the feet and the treatment of minor foot complaints..............U.S., chiropody is known as podiatry. [Collins Dict. of Medicine, R.M.Youngson 1992].

2). Definition of Patient rights, the entitlement of patients, especially those in hospital, to considerate and respectful care.....................[Collins, as above].

3). Definition of Demand, a desire of would-be purchasers or users for commodity. [The Concise Oxford Dictionary 1982].

Our Patients have paid through their taxes or privately by putting their hands in their pockets to pay for a SERVICE that practically no longer exists in their NHS.

WHY?

I wonder whether someone well versed in our profession such as you Bill would care to comment on relationships between the profession and the Patient if you would be so kind? Nurses etc. were doing it before chiropody arrived on the scene, they still work under their Doctors. Some would say that we are much more skillful than they, or are we? I hope I have not dropped you in it Bill but I would like to here your opinion even if it's out of step with mine!!!

Regards,

Colin.

P.S. I, of course have centred on the U.K. only here!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 6th May 2005, 07:45 AM
Arztin
Guest
 
About:
Posts: n/a
CPD Points: 0 [What is this?]
Angry who are we and why bother to continue...

Who are we and why bother to exist at all? I have just email my concern as
a direct response. Please see attachment for the rest.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th May 2005, 09:42 AM
random random is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Like everything else

bottom line of this whole argument is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, not health care
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th May 2005, 03:15 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,927
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 851 Times in 586 Posts
Default

Who treats feet?

Podiatrists
Orthopedic surgeons
Pedorthists
Physiotherapists
Orthotists
Nurses
Chiropractors
Osteopaths
Biomechanists
General medical pactitioners
Dermatologists
etc
...you can even get your custom made orthoses via eBay

Podiatrist don't, and have never, "own" the foot.

Its been that way since year one. Its was like that when I graduated and has been since then. The negativists have been predicting the end of Podiatry since then as well. Despite that the Podiatry profession has continued to grow in size and scope of practice in every country. Whats the issue?
__________________
Craig Payne
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Follow me on Twitter | Run Junkie | Latest Blog Post: Review of Lieberman et al’s (2010) paper in Nature on Barefoot Running
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.

Last edited by Admin2 : 6th May 2005 at 09:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 6th May 2005, 05:03 PM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default A Mythical Profession?

Hi Craig,
The old state registered sector of our profession in the NHS - UK. appear to have withdrawn from basic chiropody. Nail, corn and callus cutting?

The withdrawal has not taken place through the attitude of working podiatrists but the manipulation of the NEED/DEMAND. Putting it bluntly it would appear that the application of older patients to have their nails cut because they cannot reach them themselves have met with rejection for various reasons by those in the profession dictating policy within the NHS.! Or this is the impression one is given when talking to these patients seeking someone, anyone to cut their nails??? Removal from treatment lists also comes to light from time to time when corns and callus have to be taken outside the NHS?

The Point I suppose I am making is despite the abolishing of Grade 2 type chiropodists in our Giant NHS-UK. the Patient Need/Demand appears to be increasing not decreasing as the elderly grow in numbers!

If podiatry cannot or will not meet this increasing Demand who will?

Nurses are an obvious choice! Problem is now they are degree level standard? This means in practice lower numbers coming forward into nursing. They are not able even to sustain the numbers they have already got. Never mind increasing them to take on additional duties like feet? Foreign nurses galore being shipped in to replace the SEN's now degree standard!!!

Chiropody is not at the top of the list regarding nursing if I was to hazard a guess.

It appears a new RULE now exists, and that is what is different I think today, and was not so apparent in the past,

..."Promote a profession to Degree Level standard automatically reduces the numerical strength qualifying?"...
This leaves a high proportion of PATIENTS without adequate care!!!

A NEW PRACTITIONER APPEARS ON THE HORIZON TO SATISFY THE NEED/DEMAND!!!

The HPC. ends up regulating themselves! The profession can fit into a telephone box. Is this an extreme consequence of a academic interference in a natural cause?

Could there be other consequences I wonder,

1. A very small Podiatry Profession of Specialists doing other things? Not in touch with CHIROPODY, the Patients NEEDS...DEMANDS!

2. Nurses, FHP's, Voluntary nail cutters appearing out of the woodwork to satisfy the demand?

3. Private Sector 'Jack of all Trades', some good, some not so good?

Where have I seen this before, 1960 perhaps?

Regards,

Colin.

Last edited by C Bain : 6th May 2005 at 05:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 6th May 2005, 05:11 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,927
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 851 Times in 586 Posts
Default

Quote:
If podiatry cannot or will not meet this increasing Demand who will?
Given health care resources are limited, what resources are available should be spent on where the health gains are the greatest. Where is the health gain in providing a toe nail cutting service?

Podiatry (and every other profession) are under pressures like this for a very long time. Podiatry is a growing profession, the numbers of Podiatrists are increasing, the scope of practice is increasing. I see all this as a positive and not the beginning of the end.

The creative and innovative who take advantages of the opporunities being presented will thrive. If Podiatry "looses" in the marketplace, don't you think we deserve to loose?
__________________
Craig Payne
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Follow me on Twitter | Run Junkie | Latest Blog Post: Review of Lieberman et al’s (2010) paper in Nature on Barefoot Running
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 6th May 2005, 05:41 PM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Hi Craig,

Take your point!

My point is that we have raised the professional skill above the basic demand of the PATIENT! (It's not what they want!). Degree level is to high for basic chiropody, basic nursing, etc. We have cut out very conscientious bright people who are craftsman, technicians! They do not need degree standard to do the job. A whole strata of health workers have been removed and dust-binned without putting anybody in their place!

Worse than this, we now have rationing of treatments developing! Government bodies in the very near future to decide who lives and who dies. NICE in UK has decided that all and sundry can have certain treatments but not the old!!!

Getting off the point I think but possibly a good illustration?

Regards,

Colin.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 8th May 2005, 08:58 PM
Sean Millar Sean Millar is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 39
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default More than routine care

Routine care is more the cut and come again. As I explain to students on pratice placements. When you graduate you spend the first few years mastering your podiatry skills. Along the way you start to develop new skills in assessment, understand how it all fits together. As you progress to a more advanced practitioner, you start to see the whole patient and not just the feet. I am sure many of you have diagnosed systemic diseases and problems in your patients. The practitioner then becomes a vital tool in linking these patients to resources whether GP's, or others.
The patients appreciate the level of expert practitioner you have become, not just the routine care you provide. If it was purely nail and dermatological lesions they wanted addressed they could seek out a nail tech. and similarly a nurse suitably qualified.
I recall a incident were a podiatry position (could not be filled) was replaced by trained nurses. They went through 3 nurses who all developed RSI.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 8th May 2005, 09:06 PM
Sean Millar Sean Millar is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 39
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Public systems always in demand

In may be skeptical, but it is in the best interst of governments to create demand. If they spend millions of dollars on providing access to services such as podiatry. then those in private insurance will wonder way they bother with their insurance. The result is individuals drop out of private health insurance and sign up with the newly revised all bells and whistles governement service. Now again longer waitlists, and now the system is again under resourced.
Longer wait lists and unresourced services keep individuals in private health insurance. This helps maintain an lid on health spending required. Spend a little as required but never fix it. That way the government is seen to do the right thing. A vote winnner.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 8th May 2005, 09:13 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,927
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 95
Thanked 851 Times in 586 Posts
Talking

Waiting lists are a legitimate way to allocate scare/limited public resources..... the problem is thats its hard to accept this when you are the one on the waiting list.
__________________
Craig Payne
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Follow me on Twitter | Run Junkie | Latest Blog Post: Review of Lieberman et al’s (2010) paper in Nature on Barefoot Running
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 9th May 2005, 07:32 PM
Arztin
Guest
 
About:
Posts: n/a
CPD Points: 0 [What is this?]
Unhappy But we don't push back.

To Payne:
My issue is that if someone wanted to prescribe a back brace that would
help to correct a scoliosis and in turn reverse a drop foot condition due to
radiculopathy as a podiatrist, one would never hear the end of it from the
orthopod to the certified orthotist/prosthetist. There are codes here in
the USA for gait analysis that we are not allowed to use but a PT can use
and get paid for it. I don't mind other doctors doing what we do because
I know there are so few of them doing it that I am not threatened by them
taking over the main thing we do...corns, calluses and toenails. I don't
even mind PT getting paid for gait analysis especially if they are as astute
in biomechanics as Jahrling Lothar is of Germany. If anyone should be upset
about them getting paid and not us (in the US) then it should be directed
at our healthcare system for the absolute insult and discrepancy. But it
is much easier to insult each other and back stab each other then it is to
push back and protect our profession from others. Now we got these nurses
wanting to do nails etc. and again where is the PUSH. As primary care
podiatric physician, we should be able to give flu shots to our diabetics.
Nurses and even pharmacists can give them. Why can't we. But all of
a sudden a nurse can work on the feet. If we can't do what they do then
they shouldn't do what we do. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. I do not even care if they
DID start first (as the other gentleman mentioned). Apparently, they were
not doing it well enough. Otherwise, chiropody would not have needed to
be invented.
Yes, we have expanded upon podiatry. But the bottom line is that we
are also becoming "too big for our bridges." There is going to come to a
point when surgical debridement of severely deformed and fungal infested
toenails wil take preference over that bunionectomy especially with at
risk patients. Then what will we do? If I was an insurance company, I
wouldn't pay some surgical fanatic anything for that damn pointless
surgery if there have also been cases where he or she turned away
palliative care. In fact, a diabetic patient consistently lost toes be-
cause his fancy foot surgeon would not do his toenails. A DIABETIC
patient. I started seeing him because he had started to develope distal
clavi at his remaining toes. I have trimmed them off and they were
doing okay until he went to one these absurd casino gambling boats
and did lots of walking and lots of standing at the slot machines.
According to his not much help herself wife, they offered him a wheel
chair to get around in but he refused. The one toe wind up getting
severely infected and I had no choice to send him back to the surgeon.
He winded up losing another toe and I even tried to prescribe special
orthotics and diabetic shoes which his SURGEON never did do. When I
tried to schedule him for the casting, he refused saying he wanted to
keep wearing those Stacy Adams. Well, he wasn't my primary patient
so I can understand why he did not feel comfortable with me. But for
his insurance to keep paying this surgeon for REMOVING toes that could
have been prevented is just irresponsible especially since according to
the spouse, the idea of toe filler orthotics & shoes was never even
presented.
You know, we can go back and forth with this mess we ALL got ourselves
into until the end of the world comes (if you believe in that). No one is
going to fix it for us but us. Incidentally, this is my last visit. I really
have no use for a forum that is so willing to involve nurses in a site, I
thought, was designed for licensed podiatrists/chiropodists (happy,
Payne). I really was embarassed when it was suggested that patients
should not post anything after a patient who really needed OUR help
wrote in. This is the time when we SHOULD have an open house for the
only people we should answer to...patients with foot problems. If
some nurse can write in then why can't patients. Just goes to show
that we have gotten too big for our patients. The OT-forum.de takes
messages from patients. Why can't podiatry arena. Good bye.

Oh, no one never HAS answered the question, when and where
podiatry was invented. And why.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10th May 2005, 12:25 AM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Comparisons!

Hi Arztin,

A few comments re. your Post above, I hope without malice,

1. I think, '....when and where podiatry was invented. And why....'. This has been shown and answered in English History in the 16th.,17th.Century I think? Sorry but I cannot remember which historian?

Answer, "The Barber Surgeon who did it all because the Physicians just might have been killing to many people at the time? There were some good physicians about, however, they where HERBALISTS!" Not to happy going to the barbers these days to have my hair off, teeth out and toes off, however! Although I don't know though!!! Have a look at 'The Royal College of Surgeons' Website I'm sure they will have one?

2. I don't mean any disrespect but if, (US., UK. and EU. (Who I'm trying to give up, a terrible malfunction of the brain!), and Australia, (If I can spell it at this time in the morning?)), as I strongly suspect are all different with respect to PODIATRY as defined by different ruling bodies. I can only quote mine, 'A chiropodist/podiatrist diagnoses and treats disorders, diseases and deformities of the feet.' [HPC. Windows Screen Registration Section May,2005! www.hpc-uk.org/.

The Nouns, Podiatrist/ Podiatry, I think have several meanings in several country's around the world?

3. Using Websites to diagnose foot problems fills me with horror, I'm strongly opposed!!! It's bad enough diagnosing a foot complaint face to face let alone using what I believe to be attempting to use a crystal ball? But if I where living in the USA., I could, however, suspect that I could be wrong about this as it appears everyone in the USA are doing it?

Regards,

Colin.

No P.S. Here, I could be sueded!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 4th June 2005, 10:48 AM
ehresources ehresources is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Join Date: Jun 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Yikes!

It was an interesting debate to read until the rant near the end. May I clarify a few things?
First, Nursing has "lost" many tasks as the need for a practitioner with more highly specialized training became evident. It was not because nurses were not doing a good job!!!!! The needs of the client changed and a new specialty developed in order to fill the need. Just as the role of the podiatrist has changed and evolved, so has the role of the foot care nurse. We are a nursing specialty where extra training is required.
Nursing foot care is not new. I have been doing it for over 10 years and it was being done long before I started.
I also have reservations/concerns about what is happening in nursing foot care. there is a huge movement amongst foot care nurses to standardize. The WOCNB (? - I always get it wrong) exam concerns me as well. For example, the education requirements are low even to me. I am going to write the exam to see what it's all about. I'll get back to you about it if you're interested...
I work as a professor for a nursing foot care course. Might I suggest that when discussing the role of another health care provider, you actually speak with some and look at what they learn? Again, I would be more than happy to accommodate...
I rememeber when I was in nursing school how shocked the medical students were are what we were studying and what we were required to know in order to become RNs. This has led to more mutual understanding and respect. Lesson to be learned here????
We are not trying to be podiatrists. We have no desire to be podiatrists. We are not trying to replace or fill a shortage of podiatrists. We have a role to play and function well as a member of the team. I work quite well with all the podiatrists in my city. I know my limits and refer up to the podiatrist or seek their opinions as necessary. They send clients to me. Team work...
J
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11th July 2006, 01:09 AM
Aquaped Foot Care Aquaped Foot Care is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Exmouth, W.A.
Posts: 6
Join Date: Jan 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Foot Care Nurses

Quote:
Originally Posted by ehresources
It was an interesting debate to read until the rant near the end. May I clarify a few things?
First, Nursing has "lost" many tasks as the need for a practitioner with more highly specialized training became evident. It was not because nurses were not doing a good job!!!!! The needs of the client changed and a new specialty developed in order to fill the need. Just as the role of the podiatrist has changed and evolved, so has the role of the foot care nurse. We are a nursing specialty where extra training is required.
Nursing foot care is not new. I have been doing it for over 10 years and it was being done long before I started.
I also have reservations/concerns about what is happening in nursing foot care. there is a huge movement amongst foot care nurses to standardize. The WOCNB (? - I always get it wrong) exam concerns me as well. For example, the education requirements are low even to me. I am going to write the exam to see what it's all about. I'll get back to you about it if you're interested...
I work as a professor for a nursing foot care course. Might I suggest that when discussing the role of another health care provider, you actually speak with some and look at what they learn? Again, I would be more than happy to accommodate...
I rememeber when I was in nursing school how shocked the medical students were are what we were studying and what we were required to know in order to become RNs. This has led to more mutual understanding and respect. Lesson to be learned here????
We are not trying to be podiatrists. We have no desire to be podiatrists. We are not trying to replace or fill a shortage of podiatrists. We have a role to play and function well as a member of the team. I work quite well with all the podiatrists in my city. I know my limits and refer up to the podiatrist or seek their opinions as necessary. They send clients to me. Team work...
J
:) Sooo delighted to read your common sense appraisal of our foot care role, am in total agreement. I have set up my clinic in my home (home business) with a Shire permit and backed by NEIS for the first yearto fill an obvious gap in the market and my mobile, elderly clients are flocking to the door to have their nails cut 4-6 weekly, any problems I refer to the local Pod. Part of my service includes B/P and diagnostic diabetic test. I love my work, and will continue. I was taught primary nursing care (nail cutting) in my degree for nursing and use it! Good Luck to all involved with preserving mobility!!!--Anita
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 23rd July 2006, 02:26 AM
achilles's Avatar
achilles achilles is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 44
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

It would seem to me that this is simply about allocation of resources.
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to adequately assess a patient ??
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to provide the technical elements of routine foot care??

The fact is that within the NHS in the UK, the initiation of the assistant practitioner role is to allocate technical work to Grade 4 , whilst being clinically supervised by Podiatrists.
Is this not a better form of resource allocation?

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23rd July 2006, 02:44 AM
Mark Russell's Avatar
Mark Russell Mark Russell is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,140
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 299
Thanked 653 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Tony

There are merits with introducing an assistant practitioner role in podiatry, but there are dangers too, especially if they can practice unsupervised and if the regulatory mechanisms allow independent practice in the private marketplace. We could end up in the uneviable position of the previous forty years with a regulated podiatric workforce and an unregulated foot health professional workforce, which will severely undermine the market potential for graduate practitioners. Provided assistant practitioners work under direct supervision both within the NHS and in private practice and have their scope of practice strictly defined, I don't have a problem with their introduction.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23rd July 2006, 03:13 AM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default NHS. Ward Nurses Treatment of Feet!

Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles
It would seem to me that this is simply about allocation of resources.
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to adequately assess a patient ??
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to provide the technical elements of routine foot care??

The fact is that within the NHS in the UK, the initiation of the assistant practitioner role is to allocate technical work to Grade 4 , whilst being clinically supervised by Podiatrists.
Is this not a better form of resource allocation?

Tony
__________________________________________________ ______
Hi Tony,

Sounds interesting, my experience from the outside looking in is that Nurses on the Wards are being offered short courses in Nail cutting and general Chiropody as expected now that nail cutting appears to have been downgraded out of NHS. Podiatry?

I have new patients who are prepared to pay to have their toe nails and corns cut and treated mainly because some of them need a doctor's letter locally everytime they seek a new appointment! Of course the toe could have fallen off before they get one? (Only joking, I think!).

The hospital seems to be working well with the odd nurse on the Ward taking the course and using it! The next generation of Podiatrists perhaps, (Nursing Degree standard always a good start for the next step into Podiatry?). But where have all the NHS. Podiatrists gone? Flown south for the winter perhaps and haven't returned?

Is there a drop in NHS. Podiatrists numbers or is it just my imagination?

Yours,

Colin.

PS. Two for the price of one a most definite improvement on management profitability perhaps? Always a good Element in the Industrial Revolution? Down grade skills. Semi-skilled much more numerous and cheaper to train and employ. Good for numbers of patients treated too. Much needed Jobs in the NHS. and a promotion for good management?

PPS. Trouble is it is beginning to sound like a broken record all over again?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 23rd July 2006, 07:25 AM
achilles's Avatar
achilles achilles is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 44
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Provided assistant practitioners work under direct supervision both within the NHS and in private practice and have their scope of practice strictly defined, I don't have a problem with their introduction.
Couldn't agree more, Mark.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 23rd July 2006, 08:20 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,764
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 448
Thanked 1,059 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to adequately assess a patient ??
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to provide the technical elements of routine foot care??
No.

So why do we need Podiatrist's to be degree educated at all?
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 23rd July 2006, 09:27 AM
C Bain C Bain is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Hi All,

It is the Guild-monopoly all over again. History does repeat itself. The perfect world for the expert! Control and keep the skill to oneself don't you think!

Excuse or main argument, It will be safer for the patient! But can the expert in such as the NHS. give the time to justify their case? Only if they jettison work such as nail cutting.

But just a minute, if they do that they will not see the feet until there is something dropping off perhaps. Which is more important, the Patient or the Practitioner bearing in mind the NHS. is now run as a business in part???

Yours,

Colin.

Last edited by C Bain : 24th July 2006 at 03:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 23rd July 2006, 01:09 PM
martinharvey's Avatar
martinharvey martinharvey is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tamworth, Central England
Posts: 75
Join Date: Jul 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Default Who fixes your cars brakes? The mailman?

Simon, I'm interested in your reasoning behind the first No. Also your definition of 'adequate'

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to adequately assess a patient ??

No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by achilles
Does it require a degree educated podiatrist to provide the technical elements of routine foot care??

No.

So why do we need Podiatrist's to be degree educated at all?
Perhaps one good reason could be that even when we are cutting nails we are using our eyes and noses and ears. However, none of the foregoing is any use at all without a personal knowledge base, I thought higher education was supposed to provide this. ........; look at that mole (but is it an MM?) What a funny shaped toe! (hold on. what about - empyema, pulmonary carcinoma?) That little lumpy thing (wait- synovial sarcoma?) and so on and so on.

I'm sure that my Postman COULD change my cars brakes, but could I blame him if nobody had told him to check the brake hoses, personally I'll stick with a skilled mechanic, even for the simple jobs. If people choose to pay our charges to have us cut their nails (and keep our brains in gear while we do so), when I'm sure a pedicurist would be cheaper, then personally for me, thats fine.

If you think our routine cases are boring, just ask a GP. Sometimes, the ones I work alongside come into the break room glassy eyed, from saying the same thing dozens of times a day, day in and day out. And I think they train just a little longer than we do. But, the very next 'routine' case they see may just end up owing their life to that Doctors knowledge.

Perhaps they don't need degrees either?

Regards,

Martin
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 23rd July 2006, 04:40 PM
Mark Russell's Avatar
Mark Russell Mark Russell is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,140
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 299
Thanked 653 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Not sure I agree with you Martin. Most graduates will tell you they are over-qualified for most of the work they do - especially in the NHS - where most practice these days is restricted to changing wound care dressings, something nurses used to do. The problem we have is that the present three year podiatry degree and scope of practice falls between something that is overqualified for general footcare and underqualified for a foot specialist. Personally I would like to see podiatry education extended to a five year doctorate course encompassing foot surgery at undergraduate level, but as the NHS still funds podiatry education, this may not be possible for some time yet. The big question is - are thirteen podiatry schools viable in the UK?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 23rd July 2006, 05:55 PM
Cameron's Avatar
Cameron Cameron is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 585
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Netizens

Always an interesting topic.

I am working in chronic disease management at present and almost come to a cathartic conclusion that our profession works on two separate levels. The majority promote total patient dependence on podiatry and the rest encourage negociated care with their clients (empowerment) The former view nail care (pedicure) as either non essential housekeeping which frustratingly forms a large part of the workload; or a normal part of foot health care within their patient demographic. In truth more people seek help out with podiatry (including self-care) than go to podiatrists, so I think this makes it all the more essential practitioners acknowledge what they do for a living, and asimportant,what their limitations are asapractitioner. Alternatively, pinning for "greener grass' is not healthy and much cause for work related stress as has been seen in reported surveys on stress.

As to how best to prepare a work force to meet these challenges.

That is worth a bottle of good brandy, and an evening in by the fire (winter in Oz), or a BBQ in the Northern Hemisphere.

Cameron
Hey,what do I know ?
__________________

Cameron Kippen, Podologist and Shoe Historian




Cameron Kippen
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 24th July 2006, 10:07 AM
Simon Spooner's Avatar
Simon Spooner Simon Spooner is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: "I'm sick of flags - whatever colour. There's only one flag - the white flag.": Paul Hewson
Posts: 7,764
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 448
Thanked 1,059 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinharvey
Simon, I'm interested in your reasoning behind the first No. Also your definition of 'adequate'
Martin what you should remember here is that up until 1990/1 degree's in podiatry didn't exist. I think I'm right in saying that my cohort at Eastbourne were the first to graduate (although I'm not sure whether the year above got retrospective degrees- hence the 90/1 thing above) so anyone qualifying before this time were diplomates. So in other words these people, many of whom may not have converted their diplomas to degrees, are still working in practice and are as capable as any degree bearing individual in performing said assessment of patient.

Also, what if I trained an individual to do one task, lets say an ABPI. Are you telling me that with enough training this individual could not perofrm this single assessment and interpret the results?

We all like to think that what we do is really technically challenging, in isolation each task is not. It is the whole which is worthy of degree- but this wasn't the question. Moreover, the degree is just the indicator of the level of learning BTW. In my years of teaching I came across an number of first class students who I wouldn't have trusted to sit the right way around on a toilet seat, let alone look after my feet. They could however play the academic game. Equally, I worked with a number of students who ended up with pretty crappy degrees but were excellent clinicians.
__________________
Who? What? When? Why? Yeah? And? So? What?

"My mission drive is to open up my eyes, 'cause the wicked lies and all the sh!te you say..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4NW5S1UTPQ

"Science is the antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition."
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The effects of foot disease on quality of life Admin General Issues and Discussion Forum 1 24th January 2012 01:29 PM
The Foot Hylton Menz Journals Online 13 2nd December 2008 04:42 PM
Foot & Ankle International Admin Journals Online 19 17th November 2008 10:44 PM
Nurses Entrepreneurial Foot Care Association of Canada Admin Canada 18 7th June 2005 03:01 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:19 AM.