Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.
You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Press Release: Study Finds Risks and Benefits from Vibram FiveFingers
Quote:
The American Council on Exercise (ACE) said an independent study on Vibram FiveFingers found the while the glove-like shoes may be beneficial for those who suffer from chronic running injuries, using Vibrams and barefoot-style shoes for running can pose additional risks if runners do not adopt the correct foot-to-ground strike style. The independent study was conducted by the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, Exercise and Health Program, and led by John Porcari, Ph.D., and Caitlin McCarthy, M.S.
The study evaluated 16 healthy, injury-free female subjects, ages 19 to 25, all of whom were considered recreational joggers. Prior to the beginning of the study, each subject was fitted with a pair of Vibram FiveFingers Bikila, which are specially designed for running. For two weeks prior to the test, the subjects wore the shoes while running three times a week, for 20 minutes per day, to become accustomed with the new shoe style.
After the two-week acclimation period, participants returned to the lab for 3-D motion analysis and measurement of ground-reaction forces as they ran under three different conditions. Subjects were measured as they ran on a 20-meter runway while wearing Vibrams, while wearing a pair of neutral running shoes and while running barefoot. Each participant completed seven trials per condition; the order was randomized between the Vibrams and the running shoes, but the barefoot condition was always measured last.
Following the tests, researchers noted that all of the subjects were rear-foot strikers when wearing the neutral running shoes, but half of the group switched to a forefoot strike pattern when wearing Vibrams or while running barefoot. The other half of the group maintained the same rear-foot strike pattern throughout all of the conditions.
Those who adopted the forefoot-strike style showed greater plantar flexion, which appears to allow better absorption of the impact forces of running. The members of the group that continued to use a rear-strike style when wearing Vibrams or running barefoot experienced a higher rate of loading, and measured higher load rates than when wearing the typical running shoes. Researchers noted that all participants experienced reduced knee flexion, which is typically associated with lower injury rates, when wearing Vibrams and running barefoot. It was also observed, however, that Vibram wearers showed greater pronation, similar to that when running in regular shoes, which may increase the risk of some overuse injuries of the lower extremity.
ACE commissioned the study to determine what happens when runners switch from their traditional running shoes to wearing minimalist running shoes like Vibram FiveFingers. Advocates of barefoot running suggest that traditional running shoes may increase a runner's risk of injury, as the shoes encourage the foot to use a heel-strike pattern, which causes more pounding and stress. Conversely, barefoot runners tend to run more lightly, landing near the balls of the feet and generating less pounding and potentially less risk of injury. Vibram suggests its product helps users simulate the feeling of being barefoot and achieve a forefoot strike run pattern while providing the abrasion protection of wearing a shoe.
"We've seen an increasing number of individuals using barefoot-style running shoes, and felt it critical to examine this trend," said American Council on Exercise's Chief Science Officer, Cedric X. Bryant, Ph.D. "The bottom line is that runners must first and foremost modify their running style for ultimate safety and benefit, and this should be done gradually through regular practice. Once that is achieved, Vibram FiveFingers can be a safe and effective shoe for those who want to experience the feel of barefoot running."
The American Council on Exercise (ACE) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting the benefits of physical activity and protecting Americans against unsafe and ineffective fitness products and instruction. ACE sponsors university-based exercise science research and is the world's largest nonprofit fitness certifying organization.
Re: Vibram Five Fingers study by American Council on Exercise
Quote:
For two weeks prior to the test, the subjects wore the shoes while running three times a week, for 20 minutes per day, to become accustomed with the new shoe style.
Thoughts on the appropriateness of this as an adequate accustomisation period?
Re: Vibram Five Fingers study by American Council on Exercise
"Once that is achieved, Vibram FiveFingers can be a safe and effective shoe for those who want to experience the feel of barefoot running."
I had a patient ask about vibrams yesterday. Personally I have always struggled with the concept of "why would i want to wear them". I wish they would use that in the marketing rather than all the b@#$%&t they go on with.
Now it's been explained as just wanting the feel of barefoot running... no thanks - just like I don't want to be a naturist.
Re: Vibram Five Fingers study by American Council on Exercise
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian G
Thoughts on the appropriateness of this as an adequate accustomisation period?
Most people I have spoken with, that are running long distance with these without injury, have said its taken them around 3 years to transition fully from running the same distances (1/2-full marathons)in typical running shoes.
Re: Vibram Five Fingers study by American Council on Exercise
Quote:
"Once that is achieved, Vibram FiveFingers can be a safe and effective shoe for those who want to experience the feel of barefoot running."
Yeah I saw that comment too. I disagree with it. Having run both barefoot and in Vibram Five Fingers my personal opinion is that they feel very different from one another.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr2pod
Most people I have spoken with, that are running long distance with these without injury, have said its taken them around 3 years to transition fully from running the same distances (1/2-full marathons)in typical running shoes.
3 years? Wow - that's a commitment! Not sure I could convince my patients to sign up to that. I think that is the other extreme. Still, rather an over cautious transition that an over zealous one. I've transitioned my future wife to running in a minimalist shoe (from her Asics stability shoes with orthoses) and so far she is running 5k within 4 months.
I guess my original point was that I believe the transition ACE used was a bit quick. Lets hope individuals who read this article don't see it as a 'recommendation'.
The results showed that:
- All the runners were rear-foot strikers when they ran in traditional shoes.
- Half of them switched to fore-foot strike when they ran in Vibrams or barefoot.
- The other half kept to the same rear-foot strike style through all of the conditions.
- Those who switched to fore-foot style, showed greater "plantar flexion" (pointing the foot away from the leg, as when you step on the gas pedal), which seemed to allow better absorption of the forces of impact.
- Those who continued with rear-strike style when running in Vibrams or barefoot, had a higher rate of loading, and their loads were higher, than when they ran in traditional shoes.
- When they ran in Vibrams or barefoot, all runners showed reduced knee flexion, which is usually linked to lower rates of injury.
- But, when runners wore Vibrams, they showed more pronation, similar to when running in regular shoes, which could increase the risks of injury in the lower limbs that can come from overuse.