Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags:

Screw Fixation Versus Casting Jones Fractures

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th June 2005, 02:33 PM
Admin2's Avatar
Admin2 Admin2 is offline
Administrator
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 1,722
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts
Default Screw Fixation Versus Casting Jones Fractures

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
Interesting finding here:

Early Screw Fixation Versus Casting in the Treatment of Acute Jones Fractures
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 33:970-975 (2005)

Quote:
Background: There is considerable variability in the literature concerning the optimal treatment of acute Jones fractures.

Hypothesis: Early surgical fixation of acute Jones fractures will result in shorter times to union and return to athletics compared with cast treatment.

Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Eighteen patients were randomized to cast treatment, and 19 patients were randomized to screw fixation. Success of treatment and the times to union and return to sports were calculated for each patient.

Results: Mean follow-up was 25.3 months (range, 15–42 months). Eight of 18 (44%) in the cast group were considered treatment failures: 5 nonunions, 1 delayed union, and 2 refractures. One of 19 patients in the surgery group was considered a treatment failure. For the surgery group, the median times to union and return to sports were 7.5 and 8.0 weeks, respectively. For the cast group, the median times were 14.5 and 15.0 weeks, respectively. The Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups in both parameters, with P < 001.

Conclusion: There is a high incidence (44%) of failure after cast treatment of acute Jones fractures. Early screw fixation results in quicker times to union and return to sports compared with cast treatment.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 27th June 2005, 10:42 PM
Kevin Kirby's Avatar
Kevin Kirby Kevin Kirby is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,120
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 309 Times in 209 Posts
Default

I have used tension band wiring for Jones fractures for the past 20 years and think that this type of internal fixation make more sense mechanically than screws. Placing the fixation device on the tension side of the fracture seems to me the most mechanically sound method of treating these fractures.
__________________
Sincerely,

Kevin

**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College

e-mail: kevinakirby@comcast.net

Private Practice:
107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
My location

Voice: (916) 925-8111 Fax: (916) 925-8136
**************************************************
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th May 2006, 01:30 AM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 3,822
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 97 Posts
Default

Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal
International Orthopaedics
Quote:
Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify those factors that influence the outcome after conservative treatment of undisplaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal. This was done with univariate analyses and, for the first time, with regression analyses of day-to-day clinical practice. Thirty-eight patients were treated with plaster and periods of no weight bearing (NWB). Their mean age was 48 years. They were evaluated using the Olerud ankle score, with analogue scales for pain and comfort, and with questions about cosmesis and wearing of shoes. Six patients sustained a Jones fracture and 32 a tuberosity avulsion fracture. The mean period of NWB was 17 days and of casting was 38 days. Three Jones fractures and all the avulsion fractures were healed at the end of treatment. After a mean of 490 days, the global ankle score was 82/100. Ten patients reported problems with shoes and nine reported cosmetic problems. The linear analogue scale for pain was 2.11/10 and for comfort 8.42/10. Gender, age, and fracture type did not affect outcome. The most significant predictor of poor functional outcome was longer NWB, which was strongly associated with worse global outcome, discomfort, and reported stiffness. NWB should be kept to a minimum for acute avulsions of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal.
__________________
Who is NewsBot?
Buy Admin a Beer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31st July 2006, 03:27 PM
HJM41 HJM41 is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N.J.
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Tension Banding Was Great For The Elbow When I Was A Resident, But Now I Would Use A Canullated Sscrew With A C-arM And A Small Stab Incision.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Pros and Cons of Computerized Foot Orthotic Technology Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 51 24th July 2009 02:30 AM
Where Should the First Ray be When Casting for Orthoses? Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 22 27th July 2005 10:22 AM
Serial casting for internal tibial torsion Kate Roberts Pediatrics 15 20th June 2005 12:32 AM
Muscle fatigue as factor in stress fractures Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 0 23rd November 2004 10:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 PM.