Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags: ,

Flat-footed 'are high achievers'

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th July 2005, 08:57 PM
Hylton Menz's Avatar
Hylton Menz Hylton Menz is offline
Moderator
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 187
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
Default Flat-footed 'are high achievers'

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
From The Age newspaper:

Flat-footed 'are high achievers'
By Harriet Alexander
July 14, 2005

Flat-Footed people suffer pain, cannot join the army and are perceived as physically inept. But research on flat-footed children shows they can jump 15 per cent higher than average children and have equally good balance and motor skills. The only area they performed worse in was "lateral hopping" - hopping sideways over a piece of string.

Dara Twomey, a University of NSW biomechanics researcher, decided to study flat feet after working as a physical education teacher for 10 years and noticing that more children seemed to have them.

She was startled by her results. "I was expecting to find that they would be worse (at jumping). I didn't think they would be able to take off the ground as easily."

Flat feet can be rigid, where there is no discernible arch, or flexible, where the arch appears when the foot is lifted from the floor. They can be caused by such factors as obesity and genetics, and people who have them are more likely to get foot, knee and lower back pain.

The study tested 54 children aged between nine and 12, half with flat feet and half with normal arches, with exercises such as balancing on one leg, hopping over a string and jumping. Each child was fitted with 17 retro-reflective devices between the knee and the foot, which monitored the interaction of their joints.

Podiatrist Michael Kinchington said the findings were surprising.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 13th July 2005, 09:49 PM
Craig Payne's Avatar
Craig Payne Craig Payne is offline
Moderator
Professor of Life, The Universe and Everything
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,108
Join Date: Aug 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 139 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Interested to know the criteria they used for flat foot...
__________________
Craig Payne
Department of Podiatry
La Trobe University
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/podiatry
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
God put me on this earth to accomplish a certain number of things - right now I am so far behind, I will never die.
The views expressed above are those of the author and not that of La Trobe University
This is where I am, where are you?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th July 2005, 07:27 AM
Cameron's Avatar
Cameron Cameron is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 585
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Netizens

As far as I can recall Carl Lewis was reported to have flat feet. This did not stop him from winning gold with style but his lifetime of punishing training has left him crippled with severe osteoarthrosis. A common outcome for many elite athletes, sadly.

As to links with aptitude, like Craig I remain sceptical. Two hundred years ago flat footedness was referred to as the 'Jewish foot; and became a stigmatised physical condition associated with sloth and a non productive member of European Society. The medical anti-Semitic theorem came about from the Darwinian belief in the survival of the fitness. The poor white population were Jewish and hence their physical appearance was taken to represent the lowest of the low and states of health were measured against it. Prevalence of flat footedness was high amongst the population and subsequently became the mark of the Jew. Gentiles keen not to be so classified as anything other than Christian, sought out (quasi)medical treatments which gave rise to the origins of foot stretching and arch support. Diabetes was also prevalent in ghetto populations and much of what was known about the disease (the Jewish Disease) in the 1950s came from this time. Intermittent claudication was again the sign of the Jew in 17th and 18th century Europe. In many text books today there remains a vestige of this anti-Semitism when conditions like 'tailor's bunion' is referred to as ' common among Mediterranean populations."

Reference

Gilman SL 1990 The Jewish body: a "footnote" Bull Hist Med 64:4 588-602 You can also read more at: http://foottalk.blogspot.com/

The rather dubious origins of flat foot (as a medical condition) remain clouded today as does its treatment and in the absence of published RCTs like to do so for some time to come.

What say you?

Cameron
__________________

Cameron Kippen, Podologist and Shoe Historian




Cameron Kippen
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th July 2005, 08:17 AM
yehuda yehuda is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: israel
Posts: 41
Join Date: Dec 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have worked with both gentiles and jews (I am a jew) and joke that our forefather Abraham must have had flat feet it does appear ( to me anyway ) that we have flatter feet ... then again we have a diproportionate amount of people that wear glasses too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th July 2005, 11:59 AM
Cameron's Avatar
Cameron Cameron is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 585
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

yehuda

The are footprints of Mohammad somewhere and guess what? They are flat footed. Guess that just goes to show we are all the same.

Cheers
Cameron
__________________

Cameron Kippen, Podologist and Shoe Historian




Cameron Kippen
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th July 2005, 12:36 PM
yehuda yehuda is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: israel
Posts: 41
Join Date: Dec 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

mohamed was a descendent of Ishmael who was also a son of Abraham

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th July 2005, 07:05 PM
Hylton Menz's Avatar
Hylton Menz Hylton Menz is offline
Moderator
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 187
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Payne
Interested to know the criteria they used for flat foot...
I've had some email contact with Dara Twomey (the author of the study) and she said that they used a combination of footprints, navicular height and medial arch angle in walking. Will be an interesting read when the full paper is published.

Here's the other media report from the study:

Flat-feet can jump higher

July 14, 2005

BEING flat-footed doesn't mean you are a nerd who shouldn't be allowed near a sporting field - in fact, it can be an advantage in some physical activities.

Dara Twomey, a University of NSW biomechanics researcher, has discovered that children with flat feet can jump up to 15 per cent higher than average in a standard vertical jump test.

The "highly detailed" comparison of 27 flat-footed children and 27 children with normally arched feet, all aged between 9 and 12, revealed that those with flat feet had stronger lower calf muscles.

No difference was found between the groups' ability to balance in normal standing, with eyes closed, on one leg, or on a wobble board.

However, the flat-footed children had difficulty with lateral hopping when asked to hop sideways over a low obstacle as many times as possible in 30 seconds.

Those with normal arches averaged 52; those with low arches only reached 40 hops.

"Further research is needed to determine why having low arches helps you to jump better, or why it hinders your lateral hopping ability," Ms Twomey said.

"But we now know that in terms of performance outcomes, there's no major disadvantage in low-arched feet."

The tests were performed in the UNSW Gait Analysis Laboratory to determine if flat feet affected children's performance of gross motor skills.

Retro-reflective markers were put at key points on the children's bodies to present three-dimensional images on a computer screen.

The children who took part in the research believed having flat feet was a physical disadvantage, and this might be affecting them psychologically, Ms Twomey said.

"Their perception was that they weren't able to perform as well ... their perception is wrong," she said.

"Children with flat feet may be disadvantaged by the stigma."

Having flat feet certainly hasn't stopped the Natoli twins from excelling in sports.

Daniella and Chiara, 13, participated in Ms Twomey's research.

They have played waterpolo and netball since they were four and their team, the Opals, won the Randwick netball competition for first grade under-13s.

"It's not a big issue for us," Daniella said. "After netball, my feet just get a bit sore."

Imelda Natoli said her daughters' feet "haven't inhibited them at all".

___


Cheers,

Hylton
Thread Starter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th July 2005, 09:18 PM
Kevin Kirby's Avatar
Kevin Kirby Kevin Kirby is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,120
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 309 Times in 209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hylton Menz
From The Age newspaper:

Flat-footed 'are high achievers'
By Harriet Alexander
July 14, 2005

Flat-Footed people suffer pain, cannot join the army and are perceived as physically inept. But research on flat-footed children shows they can jump 15 per cent higher than average children and have equally good balance and motor skills. The only area they performed worse in was "lateral hopping" - hopping sideways over a piece of string.
Vertical jumping height seems to be significantly correlated to percentage of fast twitch fibers:

Relationships between muscle fibre characteristics and physical performance capacity in trained athletic boys.
J Sports Sci 1991 Summer;9(2):161-71 (ISSN: 0264-0414)
Mero A; Jaakkola L; Komi PV
Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.



and also seems to be correlated with squat strength and sprint speed:

Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players.
Br J Sports Med 2004 Jun;38(3):285-8 (ISSN: 1473-0480)
Wisloff U; Castagna C; Helgerud J; Jones R; Hoff J
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Trondheim, Norway

I doubt that longitudinal arch height has a primary effect on vertical jump height since, from the reading I have done, vertical jump height tends to be affected much more by muscle fiber type and muscle strength in the quads and gastroc-soleus and body weight. I would wager that the low longitudinal arch height is more the result of the primary factors that cause an increase in vertical jump height, such as stronger calf muscles and more stiff Achilles tendons, for example.
__________________
Sincerely,

Kevin

**************************************************
Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
Adjunct Associate Professor
Department of Applied Biomechanics
California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College

e-mail: kevinakirby@comcast.net

Private Practice:
107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
My location

Voice: (916) 925-8111 Fax: (916) 925-8136
**************************************************
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22nd September 2005, 05:25 AM
gflorido gflorido is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Barquisimeto, Venezuela
Posts: 8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default humble theory

I agree with Kevin. Jumping performance would not be much afected as walking or running with flat feet condition. My theory is that those children jumped higher because flat feet might had developed muscle strengh in compensation, of squads and gastronimius-soleus muscles. should they compare thigh and ankle circunference between subjects ?

Last edited by gflorido : 22nd September 2005 at 05:26 AM. Reason: mistake
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th October 2005, 10:09 AM
*sole_man* *sole_man* is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Join Date: Oct 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default To the defence of the flat footies!

Hi, I have flat feet and was always excellent at sports at school and college. I was on the high jump team and was captain of the cross country running team. I am 25 years old now and continue to be a keen athlete (mainly running) and have never had problems. I was told during my studies that this is a supposed handicap and that I should make some orthoses. I refused and am not convinced that flat feet are more problematic than 'normal' feet. Incidentally I am one quarter jewish :) , James.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 1st January 2007, 12:46 AM
markjohconley's Avatar
markjohconley markjohconley is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canberra, australia
Posts: 492
Join Date: Nov 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 27 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Flat-footed 'are high achievers'

i too have 'flat feet', wasn't that bad an athlete, ran a 4' 51" mile when i was a young'un (not bad for a stockily built lad), and wait for it .......... i had a jewish friend once!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 4th March 2009, 04:49 PM
NewsBot's Avatar
NewsBot NewsBot is offline
The Admin that posts the news.
 
About:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Zoo, where all good monkeys should be
Posts: 3,822
Join Date: Jan 2006
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Flat-footed 'are high achievers'

Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years.
Tudor A, Ruzic L, Sestan B, Sirola L, Prpic T.
Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123(3):e386-92.
Quote:
OBJECTIVE. Because the controversy about the relation of foot morphology and foot function is still present, we find it surprising that there are no studies published dealing with motor skills and athletic performance in flat-footed school children. Our aim in this study was to determine if there is an association between the degree of foot flatness and several motor skills that are necessary for sport performance.

METHODS. The feet of 218 children aged 11 to 15 years were scanned, and the arch index was determined. The value of the arch index was corrected for the influence of age, and then the entire sample was categorized into 4 groups according to the flatness of their feet. The children were tested for eccentric-concentric contraction and hopping on a Kistler force platform, speed-coordination polygon (Newtest system), balance (3 tests), toe flexion (textile crunching), tiptoe standing angle, and repetitive leg movements. Altogether, 17 measures of athletic performance were measured.

RESULTS. No significant correlations between the arch height and 17 motor skills were found. Categorizing the sample into 4 groups did not reveal any differences between the groups in athletic performance. Also, several multivariate analysis of variance sets of multiple independent variables referring to a particular motor ability were not found to be significant. The differences were not found even after comparing only the 2 extreme groups, meaning children with very low and children with very high arches.

CONCLUSIONS. No disadvantages in sport performance originating from flat-footedness were confirmed. Children with flat and children with "normal" feet were equally successful at accomplishing all motor tests; thus, we suggest that there is no need for treatment of flexible flat feet with the sole purpose of improving athletic performance, as traditionally advised by many.
__________________
Who is NewsBot?
Buy Admin a Beer
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Pros and Cons of Computerized Foot Orthotic Technology Admin Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 51 24th July 2009 02:30 AM
Running shoe technology does not reduce injuries Craig Payne Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses 18 9th August 2007 07:22 PM
Burnout High Among Podiatrists Admin General Issues and Discussion Forum 6 24th November 2004 05:41 PM
Mississippi high court to hear medical malpractice case Admin USA 0 5th November 2004 02:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:52 AM.