Home Forums Marketplace Table of Contents Events Member List Site Map Register Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums, for communication between foot health professionals about podiatry and related topics.

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, earn CPD points and access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Tags: ,

Hospital infections - what do you think?

Reply
Submit Thread >  Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Google Submit to Yahoo! This Submit to Technorati Submit to StumbleUpon Submit to Spurl Submit to Netscape  < Submit Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19th July 2005, 03:49 PM
Admin2's Avatar
Admin2 Admin2 is offline
Administrator
 
About:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 1,722
Join Date: May 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts
Default Hospital infections - what do you think?

Podiatry Arena members do not see these ads
The Onion has arrved for the week with its usual particular brand of humur:
Quote:
According to a Pennsylvania study released last week, nearly 12,000 people contracted infections during hospital stays last year. What do you think?
Quote:
"This is why I remained conscious during my hip-replacement surgery and insisted that rubber gloves were worn at all times."
Quote:
A closed-off building filled with contagious people? Whose idea were hospitals, anyway?"
Quote:
"That explains why my triple-bypass surgery was done outdoors."
More

Last edited by Admin : 19th July 2005 at 07:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 6th August 2005, 06:47 AM
eddavisdpm's Avatar
eddavisdpm eddavisdpm is offline
Member
 
About:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA
Posts: 21
Join Date: Aug 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default hsoptial infections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admin2
The Onion has arrved for the week with its usual particular brand of humur:

More
My local hospital has an approxiamte 12% infection rate but my local surgicenter a 0.4% infection rate. Most podiatric surgery in the US can be performed at surgicenters and should be.
Regards,
Eddie Davis, DPM

Last edited by Admin : 6th August 2005 at 02:47 PM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th August 2005, 01:48 AM
DAVOhorn DAVOhorn is offline
Podiatry Arena Veteran
 
About:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 250
Join Date: Feb 2005
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Default infections

The only way to stop pts getting infections in hospital is to stop pts going into hospital.

Why ??????

Because hospitals are full of people who are crawling in pathogens.

Most of these pathogens are of no risk to normal healthy people but can prove fatal to those who are ill.

Denmark has a zero rate of infection for MRSA.

How is this achieved?

1: Swab all pts before admission, and refuse admission if positive.

2: Swab the only visitor allowed to visit, if positive refuse the visit.

3: ALL STAFF ARE TRAINED IN INFECTION CONTROL.

4: 70% bed occupancy , and all beds are sent for steam cleaning prior to reuse.

So the above is a fairly simple means of preventing infections.

All it requires is the will to ENFORCE IMPLEMENT this policy as it will upset many people.

Trouble is not half as much as a relative (pt or visitor or staff) contracting an infection and suffering damage.

regards David
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th August 2005, 01:14 AM
Dawn Bacon's Avatar
Dawn Bacon Dawn Bacon is offline
Senior Member
 
About:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Near Salisbury UK
Posts: 42
Join Date: Oct 2004
Marketplace reputation 0% (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

In response to your post DAVOhorn, while I can see the merits of screeining staff and hospital visitors I can't help but say that even in Denmark they must treat some MRSA positive clients. In an emergency or acute situation there is simply no time to take swabs and send off for microscopy and culture/sensitivity testing. Even for elective and non-emergency admissions this policy is ethically highly questionable, do they also refuse admission to hepatitis patients or HIV patients on the grounds that they have life threatening infections?

The solutions are not in denying ill or injured people access to health care, but in training and scrupulous cross infection prevention.

Poll
__________________
If you are on the rollercoaster, open your eyes and enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Translate This Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Podiatric Surgeons recommended in National Health Amendments (Prostheses) Bill LuckyLisfranc Australia 2 13th February 2005 07:35 PM
Rural Hospital looses surgical service, maybe gain podiatry Admin Australia 1 16th January 2005 11:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

Finding your way around:

Browse the forums.

Search the site.

Browse the tags.

Search the tags.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 PM.