Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

What is a case stated procedure?

Discussion in 'United Kingdom' started by Simon Ross, Feb 27, 2014.

  1. Simon Ross

    Simon Ross Active Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    What is a case stated procedure please?
     
  2. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    No idea. Is this a UK thing? In what context is it used?
     
  3. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    Ok, I read the above before reading Marks post in the Regulation of Podiatry thread and I get the context.

    "case stated" is when one court asks the opinion of another court on a point of law, so assume that case stated procedure is the procedure for doing that.

    As mark said:
     
  4. rosherville

    rosherville Active Member

    Usually one side or the other can ask ask another court/judge for clarification as to the law on an issue disputed. In this case it's in both Mark's and the HCPC's interest to clarify the position in regard to the claim that the legislation in regard to the HCPC is 'permissive' rather than 'mandatory' as it was with the CPSM.

    If it were found to be permissive we could all deregister !

    This has nothing to do with the fact the case was mis-presented by the HCPC and therefore 'set aside'.
     
Loading...

Share This Page